航运联盟背景下船舶绿色燃料改造问题研究

doi:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.02.017

PDF(2146 KB)

大连海事大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2) : 159-167. DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.02.017

航运联盟背景下船舶绿色燃料改造问题研究

孙薇薇¹，梁承姬^1*，石健²，王钰¹，张悦¹，鲁斌³

作者信息 +

Green fuel retrofit strategies for vessels in the shipping alliance context

SUN Weiwei¹，LIANG Chengji^1*，SHI Jian²，WANG Yu¹，ZHANG Yue¹，LU Bin³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在国际海事组织(IMO)减排战略和政府减排政策的推动下，航运公司开始改造船舶以使用绿色燃料。但船舶改造期间无法完成运输任务，无形中阻碍了船舶改造计划。在此背景下，提出了航运公司以船队联盟的方式进行合作，通过协调安排运输任务，提高船舶改造率。针对上述问题，建立了双层规划模型，上层以联盟整体经济效益最大化为目标。下层以实现班轮运输利润最大化为目标。该模型为三家联盟公司和班轮运输任务组成的多领导者-单跟随者博弈，形成具有均衡约束的均衡问题(EPEC)，利用KKT条件将模型转为多个均衡约束规划问题(MPEC)，采用对角化算法(DM)求解，并对联盟效果进行了灵敏度分析。结果表明，该模型与求解方法具有可行性，可为航运脱碳提供新思路。

Abstract

Under the impetus of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) emission reduction strategies and government policies to reduce emissions, shipping companies have started retrofitting vessels to use green fuels. However, the retrofitting of vessels disrupts regular shipping operations, indirectly impeding vessel retrofitting plans. In this context, it is proposed that shipping companies cooperate through fleet alliances, coordinating and scheduling transportation tasks to increase the rate of vessel retrofitting. To address these issues, a two-level optimization model is established. In the upper level, the objective is to maximize the overall economic benefits of the alliance. In the lower level, the focus is on maximizing the profits of liner shipping operations based on the retrofitting plans from the upper level. This model represents a multi-leader-single-follower game involving three alliance companies and liner shipping tasks, resulting in an equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints (EPEC). Using Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions, the model is transformed into multiple mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints (MPEC), and a diagonalization algorithm (DM) is applied for solving. Sensitivity analyses are conducted on the alliance effects. The results show that this model and its solving method are feasible and can provide new insights for decarbonization in the shipping industry.

导出引用

孙薇薇, 梁承姬, 石健, 王钰, 张悦, 鲁斌. 航运联盟背景下船舶绿色燃料改造问题研究[J]. 大连海事大学学报. 2024, 50(2): 159-167 https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.02.017

SUN Weiwei, LIANG Chengji, SHI Jian, WANG Yu, ZHANG Yue, LU Bin. Green fuel retrofit strategies for vessels in the shipping alliance context [J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University. 2024, 50(2): 159-167 https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.02.017

参考文献

[1] 李泽皓, 王甫, 胡卓, 袁金良. 混合动力船舶能源配置与推进系统发展现状[J]. 大连海事大学学报,2023, 49(3): 74-87. DOI:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.03.008.

LI Zehao, WANG Fu, HU Zhuo, YUAN Jinliang. Current status of energy configuration and propulsion system development for hybrid power ships [J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2023, 49(3): 74-87. DOI:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.03.008. (in Chinese)

[2] ZHANG Y, LIANG C, SHI J, LIM G, WU Y. Optimal port microgrid scheduling incorporating onshore power supply and berth allocation under uncertainty[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 313: 118856.

[3] 黄有方, 魏明晖, 王煜, 郭晓燕, 黄明中. “双碳”目标导向下我国绿色航运物流发展现状与趋势[J]. 大连海事大学学报,2023,49(1): 1-16. DOI:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.01.001.

HUANG Youfang, WEI Minghui, WANG Yu, GUO Xiaoyan, HUANG Mingzhong. Current situation and trend of green shipping logistics in China under the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2023, 49(1): 1-16. DOI:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.01.001. (in Chinese)

[4] 王鹏. 国际航运业碳减排和船舶燃料转型趋势[J]. 国际石油经济, 2021,29(7): 52–62.

WANG P. International shipping decarbonization and fuels transition [J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2021,29(7): 52–62. (in Chinese)

[5] DENG J J, WANG X C, WEI Z L, WANG L, WANG C Y, CHEN Z B. A review of NO_x and SO_x emission reduction technologies for marine diesel engines and the potential evaluation of liquefied natural gas fuelled vessels[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 766: 144319.

[6] SONG C X, WANG Y D. Slot allocation and exchange for container shipping alliance under profit-sharing agreement and uncertain demand[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 229: 106335.

[7] CHEN J H, ZHUANG C L, YANG C, WAN Z, ZENG X, YAO J Y. Fleet co-deployment for liner shipping alliance: Vessel pool operation with uncertain demand[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2021, 214: 105923.

[8] MÄKITIE T, STEEN M, SAETHER E A, BJØRGUM Ø, POULSEN R T. Norwegian ship-owners’ adoption of alternative fuels[J]. Energy Policy, 2022, 163: 112869.

[9] ZHANG X, BAO Z H, GE Y E. Investigating the determinants of shipowners’ emission abatement solutions for newbuilding vessels[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 99: 102989.

[10] AMPAH J D, YUSUF A A, AFRANE S, JIN C, LIU H F. Reviewing two decades of cleaner alternative marine fuels: Towards IMO’s decarbonization of the maritime transport sector[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 320: 128871.

[11] 彭传圣. 我国航运脱碳挑战及路径选择[J]. 中国海事, 2023(6): 24–29.

PENG C S. Challenges and path of China's shipping industry. [J]. China Maritime Safety, 2023(6): 24–29. (in Chinese)

[12] LIU Y, XIN X, YANG Z, CHEN K, LI C. Liner shipping network - transaction mechanism joint design model considering carbon tax and liner alliance[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2021, 212: 105817.

[13] CHEN K, YI X, XIN X, ZHANG T. Liner shipping network design model with carbon tax, seasonal freight rate fluctuations and empty container relocation[J]. Sustainable Horizons, 2023, 8: 100073.

[14] NAEBI A, SEYEDSHENAVA S, CONTRERAS J, RUIZ C, AKBARIMAJD A. EPEC approach for finding optimal day-ahead bidding strategy equilibria of multi-microgrids in active distribution networks[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2020, 117: 105702.

[15] DEVINE M T, SIDDIQUI S. Strategic investment decisions in an oligopoly with a competitive fringe: An equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 306(3): 1473–1494.

[16] WOGRIN S, BARQUÍN J, CENTENO E. Capacity expansion equilibria in liberalized electricity markets: an EPEC approach[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,28(2):1531-1539.(2012-10-16) [2024-02-22]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6331593.

[17] GUO L, LIN G H, ZHANG D L, ZHU D L. An MPEC reformulation of an EPEC model for electricity markets[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2015, 43(3): 262–267.

[18] 王一铮, 庞凯元, 文福拴, 薛禹胜, 孙轶恺, 高美金. 促进用户侧能源转型的区域能源定价与管理策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(16): 21-29.

WANG Y Z, PANG K Y, WEN F S, XUE Y S, SUN Y K, GAO M J. Regional energy pricing and management strategies for promoting user-side energy transition [J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(16): 21-29. (in Chinese)

[19] YU J J, VOß S, TANG G L. Strategy development for retrofitting ships for implementing shore side electricity[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 74: 201–213.

[20] ZHAO F, WANG Z, WANG D X, HAN F H, JI Y L, CAI W J. Top level design and evaluation of advanced low/zero carbon fuel ships power technology[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 336–344.