Research on the User Acceptance Mechanism towards Differentiated Low-Altitude Air Travel Services

SUN Shi-chao, HAO Feng-yi

Journal of Dalian Maritime University ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1) : 123-133.

PDF(6162 KB)
PDF(6162 KB)
Journal of Dalian Maritime University ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1) : 123-133.

Research on the User Acceptance Mechanism towards Differentiated Low-Altitude Air Travel Services

  • SUN Shi-chao*, HAO Feng-yi
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Against the backdrop of advancing national low-altitude economy strategies, this research examines the factors and mechanisms influencing user acceptance of two differentiated low-altitude air travel services: the fixed-route shuttle (public service type) and 'Feidi' (market-oriented service type). By refining the integrated Technology Acceptance Model–Theory of Planned Behavior (TAM–TPB) framework, a multidimensional "technology-institution-cognition" analytical framework was constructed and empirically validated using a dual-scenario structural equation modeling approach based on questionnaire survey data. The findings reveal that fixed-route shuttle services exhibit a technology-function-dominated decision-making logic, where technology trust not only directly drives usage intention but also indirectly enhances acceptance by improving perceived usefulness and reducing risk perception. In contrast, 'Feidi' services follow an experience-driven decision-making pathway, where technology trust indirectly influences usage intention through attitude, with user decisions relying more heavily on perceived behavioral control and subjective experience. Drawing from the underlying user decision mechanisms, differentiated strategic guidance is provided for manufacturers' technology development priorities, operators' user experience optimization, and regulatory authorities' institutional design, thereby offering theoretical foundation and operational direction for promoting the industrial application of low-altitude air travel services.

Key words

 low-altitude air travel / differentiated service models / integrated TAM-TPB model / acceptance mechanism / structural equation modeling

Cite this article

Download Citations
SUN Shi-chao, HAO Feng-yi. Research on the User Acceptance Mechanism towards Differentiated Low-Altitude Air Travel Services[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University. 2026, 52(1): 123-133

References

[1]EUROPEAN UNION AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, MCKINSEY & COMPANY. Study on the societal acceptance of urban air mobility in Europe[R]. Cologne: European Union Aviation Safety Agency, 2021.
[2]AL HADDAD C, CHANIOTAKIS E, STRAUBINGER A, et al. Factors affecting the adoption and use of urban air mobility [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 132: 696-712. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.021.
[3]WU J L, HE Q, SINGH A K, et al. What drives users to accept flying cars for urban air mobility? Findings from an empirical study [J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2024, 119: 102645. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102645.
[4]陈可.基于ICLV模型的“空中飞的”使用意愿及选择行为研究[D].东南大学,2023.DOI:10.27014/d.cnki.gdnau.2023.001915. 
CHEN K. Research on the Intention to Use and Choice Behavior of Air Taxis Based on the ICLV Model [D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2023. DOI:10.27014/d.cnki.gdnau.2023.001915.(in Chinese)
[5]YAO E, GUO D, LIU S, et al. The role of technology belief, perceived risk and initial trust in users’ acceptance of urban air mobility: an empirical case in China [J]. Multimodal Transportation, 2024, 3(4):100169. DOI:10.1016/j.multra.2024.100169.
[6]SRINIVASAN R. Exploring the impact of social norms and online shop** anxiety in the adoption of online apparel shop** by Indian consumers [J]. Journal of Internet Commerce, 2015, 14(2): 177-199. DOI: 10.1080/15332861.2015.1024835.
[7]TAYLOR S, TODD P A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models [J]. Information Systems Research, 1995, 6(2): 144-176.
[8]WANG J Z, ZHAO S, ZHANG W, et al.Why people adopt smart transportation services: An integrated model of TAM, trust and perceived risk [J]. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2021, 44(6): 629-646. DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2021.1916579.
[9]孙龄波,唐秋生,游宇.基于改进TAM的无人驾驶出租车接受度研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2022,19(06):1540-1549.DOI:10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.t20210822.
SUN L B, TANG Q S, YOU Y. Research on the acceptance of driverless taxi based on improved TAM [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 1540-1549. DOI:10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.t20210822. (in Chinese)
[10]GUO L R, BURKE M G, GRIGGS W M. A new framework to predict and visualize technology acceptance: A case study of shared autonomous vehicles [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, 212: 123960. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123960.
[11]鞠鹏,周晶,陈星光,等.基于TAM和TPB整合模型的汽车共享使用意向研究[J].管理现代化,2016,36(04):82-85.
JU P, ZHOU J, CHEN X G, et al. Research on carsharing usage intention based on integrated TAM and TPB model [J]. Modernization of Management, 2016, 36(04): 82-85. (in Chinese)
[12]薛寒欣.新能源汽车推广激励政策的影响机制研究[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2025,24(01):74-85.
XUE H X. Research on the impact mechanism of incentive policies for promoting new energy vehicles [J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University (Social Science Edition), 2025, 24(01): 74-85. (in Chinese)
[13]霍治方,刘刚,樊正德.中国公众对新兴技术采纳的影响机理研究——基于自动驾驶汽车社会实验调查的微观证据[J].科学学研究,2025,43(02):311-324.DOI:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240723.001.
HUO Z F, LIU G, FAN Z D. Research on the influence mechanism of Chinese public's adoption of emerging technology: Micro evidence from a social experiment survey on autonomous vehicles [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2025, 43(02): 311-324. DOI:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240723.001. (in Chinese)

PDF(6162 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/