Dual-objective optimization for liner schedule recovery considering anticipated operational disruptions under carbon trading constraints

Expand
  • (College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Online published: 2026-07-13

Abstract

This paper addressed the vessel schedule recovery problem (VSRP) for container liners suffering delays caused by disruptive incidents, and introduced the shipping carbon trading mechanism. A dual-objective optimization model for VSRP was established to minimize voyage schedule recovery costs and maximize customer service level. For scenarios with anticipated operational disruptions, the optimal combined strategy consisting of speed adjustment, port skipping and port swapping was solved. An improved adaptive non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) was designed to solve the proposed model. Multiple scenario-based numerical examples verify the effectiveness of the proposed model and improved algorithm in this paper. Numerical results show that different durations of anticipated disruptions correspond to distinct optimal combined strategies for schedule recovery. Under the dual-objective optimization without preference, utilizing information on anticipated disruptions can reduce voyage recovery costs by 18.31% on average. Sensitivity analysis shows that when the carbon trading price rises, both the schedule recovery cost and vessel carbon emissions decrease simultaneously if the preference weight of the carbon emission reduction objective is large. Besides, an increase in carbon quotas will directly cut down the schedule recovery cost. In contrast, when the preference weight of the carbon reduction objective is small, carbon emissions follow a trend of decreasing first and then increasing. The research conclusions can provide theoretical support and decision-making references for shipping enterprises to formulate schedule recovery schemes under operational disruptions.

Cite this article

YANG Hualong, WANG Lin, ZHAO Shuaiqi, YIN Maozhen . Dual-objective optimization for liner schedule recovery considering anticipated operational disruptions under carbon trading constraints[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2026 , 52(2) : 1 -9 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2026.02.001

References

[1]BROUER B D, DIRKSEN J, PISINGER D, et al. The vessel schedule recovery problem-a MIP model for handling disruptions in liner shipping[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 224(2): 362-374.
[2]LI C, QI X T, LEE C Y. Disruption recovery for a vessel in liner shipping[J]. Transportation Science, 2015, 49(4): 900-921.
[3]邢江波, 钟铭, 王天旻. 考虑集装箱流恢复的班轮运输船期恢复模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(2): 183-188. 
XING J B, ZHONG M, WANG T M. A vessel schedule recovery model considering container flow recovery in liner shipping[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(2): 183-188. (in Chinese)
[4]HASHEMINIA H, JIANG C M. Strategic trade-off between vessel delay and schedule recovery: an empirical analysis of container liner shipping[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2017, 44(4): 458-473.
[5]朱雪斌, 吕靖. 集装箱班轮运输网络中的船期恢复模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(5): 205-216. 
ZHU X B, LV J. Ship schedule recovery model in container liner shipping network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(5): 205-216. (in Chinese)
[6] WANG J Y, ZHAO X, HUANG R. A two-stage learning-based approach incorporating sustainable port multi-resource scheduling and real-time disruption response under mixed loading mode[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics,2025,67:103513.
[7]ELMI Z, LI B K, FATHOLLAHI-FARD A M, et al. Ship schedule recovery with voluntary speed reduction zones and emission control areas[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2023, 125: 103957.
[8]ASGHARI M, JABER M Y,AL-E-HASHEM S M J M. Coordinating vessel recovery actions: analysis of disruption management in a liner shipping service[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 307(2): 627-644.
[9]王丹, 张衡. 考虑ECA边界宽度的船舶减排措施和航速优化[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2024, 50(4): 49-58.
WANG D, ZHANG H. Ship emission reduction measures and speed optimization considering ECA boundary width[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2024, 50(4): 49-58. (in Chinese)
[10]ZHOU J M, ZHAO Y Z, YAN X R, et al. Strategy and impact of liner shipping schedule recovery under ECA regulation and disruptive events[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2024, 12(8): 1405.
[11]LI S H, WANG T S. How emissions trading system affects liner ship disruption recovery[J]. Transport Policy, 2025, 169: 191-208.
[12]MENG L P, WANG X D, JIN J, et al. Optimization model for container liner ship scheduling considering disruption risks and carbon emission reduction[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(7): 1449.
[13]LI S H, TANG L, LIU J G, et al. Vessel schedule recovery strategy in liner shipping considering expected disruption[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2023, 237: 106514.
[14]WEN X, GE Y E, YIN Y Q, et al. Dynamic recovery actions in multi-objective liner shipping service with buffer times[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Maritime Engineering, 2022, 175(2): 46-62.

Outlines

/