Static and dynamic responses of half-through suspension deck tied arch bridges in service

  • LI Xiao-li ,
  • SUN Zhi-guo ,
  • GUO Nai-sheng ,
  • ZOU Yu-he ,
  • SUN Zong-guang
Expand
  • (1.Transportation Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026,China;2 College of Civil Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Beijing 101601,China)

Received date: 2018-09-12

  Revised date: 2018-10-12

  Online published: 2018-10-12

Abstract

The static and dynamic load tests and numerical analysis were carried out on an existing threespan (65m+  85m+65m) half-through arch bridge with suspension deck system. In which, the deflection and strain of arch rib, bridge deck, cross beam and suspender under static load were measured, the check coefficient was analyzed, the impact coefficient and suspender tension were tested, and the natural vibration characteristics were analyzed. Results show that the certain arch foot stiffness against negative bending moments is poor under static load, while the strength and stiffness of other components meet the specification requirements. The error of suspender tension between the measured and calculated values under dynamic load is less than 15%, and the strength meets the requirements of specifications, but the measured impact coefficient is bigger. The natural vibration characteristic mode analysis indicates that the free vertical bending vibration frequency is close to the free torsional vibration frequency. Moreover, there may be a vehicle-bridge resonance on the side span of bridge. The vibration characteristics of vehicle-bridge coupling are poor which is harmful for the fatigue stress of booms, especially the short booms.

Cite this article

LI Xiao-li , SUN Zhi-guo , GUO Nai-sheng , ZOU Yu-he , SUN Zong-guang . Static and dynamic responses of half-through suspension deck tied arch bridges in service[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2019 , 45(1) : 102 -109 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2019.01.013

References

[1]韩亮,樊健生.近年国内桥梁垮塌事故分析及思考[J].公路, 2013, (3):124-127
[2]赵虎,蒲黔辉.吊杆拱桥考虑结构缺陷及交通量增加的受力特性[J].重庆大学学报, 2014, 37(6):25-32
[3]陈天平.局部腐蚀对钢管拱肋极限承载力的影响的试验研究与有限元分析[D].广州:广州大学,2016.
[4]余印根.中、下承式拱桥悬吊桥面系强健性研究[D].福州:福州大学,2015.
[5]吴庆雄,余印根,陈宝春.下承式钢管混凝土刚架系杆拱桥吊杆断裂动力分析[J].振动与冲击, 2014, 33(15):144-14
[6]吴昊.某中承式钢管混凝土拱桥病害分析及加固设计[J].公路工程, 2017, 42(3):154-158
[7]陈宝春,余印根.公路与城市桥梁技术状况评估方法对比分析[J].中国公路学报, 2013, 26(3):94-100
[8]付文胜,田洪松,孙仲.基于钢管混凝土拱桥检测结果的主拱肋病害评估[J].桥梁建设, 2013, 43(1):47-51
[9]黄永辉,刘爱荣,王荣辉.拱肋下挠对钢管混凝土拱桥极限承载力的影响[J].公路, 2013, 58(12):87-90
[10]滕宇.钢管混凝土拱桥检测评估与加固技术研究[D].西安:长安大学,2016.
[11]卜志鹏.大跨度系杆拱桥静动载试验分析研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报自然科学版, 2015, 47(3):388-391
[12]长安大学.中华人民共和国行业推荐性标准(JTG/T J21-01-2015),公路桥梁荷载试验规程[S].北京:中华人民共和国交通部,2015.
[13]田志勇,唐茂林,蒲黔辉,等.宁波庆丰桥静、动载试验研究[J].桥梁建设, 2012, 42(5):31-36
[14]龚光,林友勤,宗周红,等.武夷山市公馆大桥静载试验分析[J].福州大学学报自然科学版, 2001, 29(5):81-84
[15]蒋新亭.国道 线库尔勒孔雀河大桥检测与荷载试验[J].山西建筑, 2008, 34(11):299-300
[16]杨建喜,陈惟珍,古锐.拱桥短吊杆动力特性分析[J].桥梁建设, 2014, 44(3):13-18
[17]张耀,孙增寿.基于车桥耦合振动的钢管混凝土系杆拱桥动力响应分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(1):103-110
Outlines

/