Influence of bump parameters on the performance of a transonic compressor cascade under different bump configuration method

HU Yi; HAN Ji-ang; QIAN Xin-wei; DING Xiao-juan; ZHONG Jing-jun

doi:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2021.02.010

2021 , Vol. 47 >Issue 2: 83 - 96

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2021.02.010

Influence of bump parameters on the performance of a transonic compressor cascade under different bump configuration method

HU Yi ,
HAN Ji-ang ,
QIAN Xin-wei ,
DING Xiao-juan ,
ZHONG Jing-jun

Expand

(1. Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering College,Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China;2. Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Received date: 2021-01-02

Revised date: 2021-02-03

Online published: 2021-02-03

Fold

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of bump configuration methods and parameters of the bump on the aerodynamic performance of transonic compressor linear cascade, the HicksHenne function, the CST parametric method, the Parsec tracing method and the polynomial interpolation function were adopted to construct the bump respectively, and numerical simulation of the linear cascade of transonic compressor with different configuration methods and parameters of the bump were carried out. The calculation results show that the blade leading edge shock shape with different configuration methods gradually changes from “λ” shock to “X” shock as the initial installation position of the bump moves backward, but the blade leading edge shock shape will change between the “λ” shock and the “X” shock when the configuration method and the height of the bump are different. When the CST parametric method is employed to construct the bump, the best initial installation position of the bump should be 0.475 times the chord length. While the other three configuration methods are used, the initial installation position of the bump is suggest to be 0.525 times the chord length. When using polynomial interpolation function to construct the bump, the height of the bump should be 0.01 times the chord length, when the other three configuration methods are adopted, the height of the bump should be 0.0125 times the chord length. When using CST parametric method to construct the bump, the length of the bump should be 0.3 times the chord length, when the other three configuration methods are adopted, the length of the bump should be 0.4 times the chord length.

Key words： transonic compressor; planar cascade; configuration method; bump parameters; aerodynamic performance; numerical simulation

Cite this article

HU Yi , HAN Ji-ang , QIAN Xin-wei , DING Xiao-juan , ZHONG Jing-jun . Influence of bump parameters on the performance of a transonic compressor cascade under different bump configuration method[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2021 , 47(2) : 83 -96 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2021.02.010

References

[1] 曹志远. 附面层抽吸对轴流压气机流动控制及性能影响的研究[D]. 西北工业大学博士论文, 2014.
Cao Zhi-yuan. Investigation of Boundary Layer Suction on the Influence of Flow Control and Performance of Axial Flow Compressor[D]. Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2014.
[2] John A, Qin N, Shahpar S. Using Shock Control Bumps to Improve Transonic Fan/Compressor Blade Performance[R]. ASME Paper GT2018-77065.
[3] Schmitt V, Destarac D. Recent Progress in Drag Prediction and Reduction for Civil Transport Aircraft at ONERA[R]. AIAA Paper AIAA-98-0137, 1998.
[4] Tai T C , Huson G G , Hicks R M , et al. Transonic Characteristics of a Humped Airfoil[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1988, 25(8):673-674.
[5] Ashill P R, Fulker J L, Shires A. A Novel Technique for Controlling Shock Strength of Laminar Flow Aerofoil Sections[C]. Proceedings of the 1st European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, 1992.
[6] Milholen II W E, Owens L R. On the Application of Contour Bumps for Transonic Drag Reduction[R]. AIAA Paper AIAA2005-0462.
[7] Bruce P J K, Colliss S P. Review of Research into Shock Control Bumps[J]. Shock Wave, 2015, 25(5):451-471.
[8] Sommerer A, Lutz T, Wagner S. Numerical Optimisation of Adaptive Transonic Airfoils with Variable Camber[C]. 22nd International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences, 2000.
[9] Wadehn W, Sommerer A, Lutz T, et al. Structural Concepts and Aerodynamic Design of Shock Control Bumps[C]. 23rd International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences, 2002.
[10] Stanewsky E, Delery J, Fulker J L, et al. EUROSHOCK II-Drag Reduction by Shock and Boundary Layer Control[M]. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
[11] Tian Y, Liu P Q, Feng P H. Shock Control Bump Parametric Research on Supercritical Airfoil[J]. Science China: Technological Science, 2011, 54(11): 2935–2944.
[12] 李沛峰, 张彬乾, 陈迎春, 等. 减小翼型激波阻力的鼓包流动控制技术[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6): 971–977.
LI P F, ZHANG B Q, CHEN Y C, et al. Wave Drag Reduction of Airfoil with Shock Control Bump[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 32(6): 971–977.
[13] 陈金, 陈方, 刘洪. 超临界翼型加装鼓包减阻的数值研究及优化设计[J]. 微型电脑应用, 2011, 27(2): 1-3.
CHEN J, CHEN F, LIU H. Investigation on Drag Reduction with Bump Located on a Supercritical Airfoil and Design Optimization of the Bump[J]. Microcomputer Application, 2011, 27(2): 1-3.
[14] 董明, 葛宁, 陈云. 跨声速涡轮叶栅激波损失控制方法[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(5): 1226-1235.
DONG M, GE N, CHEN Y. Shock loss control methods for transonic turbine cascades. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(5): 1226-1235.
[15] Mazaheri K, Khatibirad S. Using a Shock Control Bump to Improve the Performance of an Axial Compressor Blade Section[J]. Shock Waves, 2017, 27(2): 299-312.
[16] 刘永振, 徐强仁, 马英群, 等. 超声速压气机叶栅前缘通道激波损失的鼓包控制研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2019, 34(10):2294-2304.
LIU Y Z, XU Q R, MA Y Q, et al. Investigation on the first passage shock loss with bump control inside a supersonic compressor cascade. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(10):2294-2304.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References