Current status and trends  of  ship navigation risk assessment in the Arctic

Expand
  • (1.Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China; 2. Dalian Key Laboratory of Safety & Security Technology for Autonomous Shipping, Dalian 116026, China; 3. Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7034, Norway; 4. Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200135, China; 5. Shenzhen Pilot Station, Shenzhen 518032, China)

Received date: 2023-02-10

  Revised date: 2023-04-05

  Online published: 2023-04-05

Abstract

This paper reviewed systematically the evolution of research topics in the field of Arctic navigation safety, and summarized the application scenarios, supporting decisionmaking, model methods, risk factors, and data sources of risk assessment. The results show that the Arctic navigation risk assessment is an important means to improve navigation safety,which mainly supports decisions on three levels: strategic level, operational level, and execution level. At present, there is still insufficient research on the frequent mechanical failures, marine pollution, propulsion system failure and other accidents, the application of risk assessment in the field of navigation safety assurance in the Northwest Passage, and the impact of risk source such as icing, high latitude, human factors on navigation safety. In the future, the standardization of quantitative risk assessment technology for Arctic navigation should be promoted, navigation risk assessment technology under the coupling of multiple risk factors should be studied,the ship intelligence and channel digitization platforms should be effectively utilized to develop real-time navigation risk prediction systems, and provide better scientific evidence for polar navigation risk prevention and control.

Cite this article

YANG Xue, ZHI Jingkai, ZHANG Wenjun, ZHOU Xiangyu, XU Sheng, HAN Bing, JIA Xiaofei . Current status and trends  of  ship navigation risk assessment in the Arctic[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2023 , 49(2) : 1 -14 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.02.001

References

 [1]LANDY J C, DAWSON G J, TSAMADOS M, et al. A year-round satellite sea-ice thickness record from CryoSat-2[J]. Nature, 2022, 609: 517-522.
[2]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability[R]. New York: IPCC, 2022.
[3]Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment. Compendium of Arctic ship accidents (CASA) [R]. Iceland: Arctic Council, 2021.
[4]马晓雪,刘阳,刘雨. 基于知识图谱的国内外北极航线安全研究进展与比较分析[J]. 交通信息与安全,2020,38(1):1-12.
MA X X, LIU Y, LIU Y. Progress and comparative analysis of domestic and international studies on Arctic shipping routes safety based on knowledge mapping[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2020, 38(1): 1-12. (in Chinese)
[5]席永涛,付姗姗,陈伟炯,等. 北极水域船舶航行风险管理研究现状分析[J]. 交通信息与安全,2020,38(3):67-76.
XI Y T, FU S S, CHEN W J, et al. A status quo analysis of studies on risk management of ship navigation in Arctic waters[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2020, 38(3): 67-76. (in Chinese)
[6]FU S S, GOERLANDT F, XI Y T. Arctic shipping risk management: a bibliometric analysis and a systematic review of risk influencing factors of navigational accidents[J]. Safety Science, 2021, 139: 105254.
[7]XU S, KIM E, HAUGEN S. Review and comparison of existing risk analysis models applied within shipping in ice-covered waters[J]. Safety Science, 2021, 141: 105335.
[8]拉桑德,豪根. 风险评估:理论、方法与应用[M]. 2版.刘一骝,杨雪,译. 北京:清华大学出版社,2022.
RAUSAND M, HAUGEN S. Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications[M].2nd ed.LIU Y L, YANG X, Translate. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2022. (in Chinese)
[9]YANG X, HAUGEN S. Classification of risk to support decision-making in hazardous processes[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 80: 115-126. 
[10]侯剑华,胡志刚. CiteSpace软件应用研究的回顾与展望[J]. 现代情报,2013,33(4):99-103.
HOU J H, HU Z G. Review on the application of CiteSpace at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2013, 33(4): 99-103. (in Chinese)
[11]李杰,陈超美. CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可视化[M].2版.北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2017.
LI J, CHEN C M. CiteSpace: text mining and visualization in scientific literature [M].2nd ed. Beijing: Capital Economic and Trade University Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
[12]SHNEIDER A M. Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist[J]. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2009, 34(5): 217-223.
[13]FU S S, ZHANG D, MONTEWKA J, et al. A quantitative approach for risk assessment of a ship stuck in ice in Arctic waters[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 107: 145-154.
[14]BAKSH A, ABBASSI R, GARANIYA V, et al. Marine transportation risk assessment using Bayesian network: application to Arctic waters[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 159: 422-436.
[15]AZIZ A, AHMED S, KHAN F, et al. Operational risk assessment model for marine vessels[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2019, 185: 348-361.
[16]ABBASSI R, KHAN F, KHAKZAD N, et al. Risk analysis of offshore transportation accident in Arctic waters[J]. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2017, 159(3): 213-223.
[17]FU S S, ZHANG D, MONTEWKA J, et al. Towards a probabilistic model for predicting ship besetting in ice in Arctic waters[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 155: 124-136.
[18]ZHANG M Y, ZHANG D, GOERLANDT F, et al. Use of HFACS and fault tree model for collision risk factors analysis of icebreaker assistance in ice-covered waters[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 111: 128-143.
[19]AFENYO M, KHAN F, VEITCH B, et al. Arctic shipping accident scenario analysis using Bayesian network approach[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 133: 224-230.
[20]ZHANG Y, HU H, DAI L. Real-time assessment and prediction on maritime risk state on the Arctic route[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2020, 47(3): 352-370.
[21]MUSSELLS O, DAWSON J, HOWELL S. Navigating pressured ice: risks and hazards for winter resource-based shipping in the Canadian Arctic[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2017, 137: 57-67.
[22]葛珊珊,张韧,杨孟倩. 气候变化背景下西北航道自然环境危险性评估[J]. 海洋通报,2017,36(2):121-127.
GE S S, ZHANG R, YANG M Q. Natural environment threat assessment for the northwest passage in the context of climate changes[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2017, 36(2): 121-127. (in Chinese)
[23]王哲,葛珊珊,张韧,等. 基于粗糙集与犹豫层次分析的北极东北航道风险评估[J]. 海洋通报,2017,36(5):512-520.
WANG Z, GE S S, ZHANG R, et al. Risk assessment of the Northeast passage of Arctic based on rough set theory and hesitate analytic hierarchy process[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 2017, 36(5): 512-520. (in Chinese)
[24]QIAN H, ZHANG R, ZHANG Y J. Dynamic risk assessment of natural environment based on dynamic Bayesian network for key nodes of the Arctic Northwest passage[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 203: 107205.
[25]单雨龙,张韧,李明. 基于动态贝叶斯网络的北极东北航道关键海区通航可行性研究[J]. 极地研究,2019,31(1):94-102.
SHAN Y L, ZHANG R, LI M. A feasibility study on navigation in a key sea area of the Northeast passage of the Arctic based on the dynamic Bayesian network[J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2019, 31(1): 94-102. (in Chinese)
[26]余梦珺,张韧,葛珊珊,等. 北极西北航道自然环境危险性评估及航线优选[J]. 海洋科学进展,2018,36(4):614-628.
YU M J, ZHANG R, GE S S, et al. Evaluation of Arctic Northwest passage’ s natural environment risk and route selection[J]. Advances in Marine Science, 2018, 36(4): 614-628. (in Chinese)
[27]LI Z, YAO C, ZHU X, et al. A decision support model for ship navigation in Arctic waters based on dynamic risk assessment[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 244: 110427.
[28]KHAN B, KHAN F, VEITCH B, et al. An operational risk analysis tool to analyze marine transportation in Arctic waters[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2018, 169: 485-502.
[29]何佩龙,马晓雪,张靖雯,等. 基于模糊层次分析-多级可拓的北极东北航线不同航段风险评价[J]. 极地研究,2021,33(2):279-293.
HE P L, MA X X, ZHANG J W, et al. Risk evaluation of different legs of Northeast Arctic route based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process–multilevel extension[J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2021, 33(2): 279-293. (in Chinese)
[30]VANHATALO J, HUUHTANEN J, BERGSTROM M, et al. Probability of a ship becoming beset in ice along the northern sea route–a Bayesian analysis of real-life data[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2021, 184: 103238.
[31]XU S, KIM E, HAUGEN S, et al. A Bayesian network risk model for predicting ship besetting in ice during convoy operations along the northern sea route[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2022, 223: 108475.
[32]李壮,付姗姗,高郭平,等. 海冰影响下船舶北极水域航行风险评估方法[J]. 交通信息与安全,2020,38(3):92-98.
LI Z, FU S S, GAO G P, et al. A risk assessment method of ship navigation in the Arctic waters under influences of sea ice[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2020, 38(3): 92-98. (in Chinese)
[33]胡甚平,轩少永,刘宇,等. 北极冰区船舶安全航行过程风险动态仿真[J]. 极地研究,2019,031(1):84-93.
HU S P, XUAN S Y, LIU Y, et al. Dynamic simulation of process risk on ship navigation at the Arctic northeast route[J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2019, 31(1): 84-93. (in Chinese)
[34]KHAN B, KHAN F, VEITCH B. A dynamic Bayesian network model for ship-ice collision risk in the Arctic waters[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 130: 104858.
[35]MONTEWKA J, GOERLANDT F, KUJALA P, et al. Towards probabilistic models for the prediction of a ship performance in dynamic ice[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2015, 112: 14-28.
[36]LI F, MONTEWKA J, GOERLANDT F, et al. A probabilistic model of ship performance in ice based on full-scale data[C]// IEEE 4th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety. Banff, IEEE, 2017: 752-758.
[37]ZHANG C, ZHANG D, Zhang M Y, et al. An integrated risk assessment model for safe Arctic navigation[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 142: 101-114.
[38]KHAN B, KHAN F, VEITCH B. A cellular automation model for convoy traffic in Arctic waters[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2019, 164: 102783.
[39]李振福,史晓梅,周玉涛. 北极航行外部环境风险评估[J]. 海洋经济,2022,12(1):11-20.
LI Z F, SHI X M, ZHOU Y T. External environmental risk assessment for Arctic navigation[J]. Marine Economy, 2022, 12(1): 11-20. (in Chinese)
[40]马晓雪,何佩龙,乔卫亮,等. 韧性视域下北极航行风险级联效应分析[J]. 极地研究,2022,34(2):219-238.
MA X X, HE P L, QIAO W L, et al. On the cascading effect of Arctic navigation risk based on the perspective of resilience[J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2022, 34(2): 219-238. (in Chinese)
[41]Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME). Arctic shipping status report #3[R]. Ottawa: PAME, 2021.
[42]谢强,陈海龙,章继峰. 极地航行船舶及海洋平台防冰和除冰技术研究进展[J]. 中国舰船研究,2017,12(1):45-53.
XIE Q, CHEN H L, ZHANG J F. Research progress of anti-icing / deicing technologies for polar ships and offshore platforms[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(1): 45-53. (in Chinese)
[43]卜淑霞,储纪龙,鲁江,等. 积冰对船舶稳性的影响[C]//《水动力学研究与进展》编委会,中国力学学会,中国造船工程学会,等.第二十七届全国水动力学研讨会文集:下册. 南京:海洋出版社,2015:63-69.
BU S X, CHU J L, LU J, et al. The effect of ship icing on stability[C]// Editorial Board of Journal of Hydrodynamics, Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Chinese Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, et al. Proceedings of the 27th National Conference on Hydrodynamics (Volume II). Nanjing: Ocean Press, 2015: 63-69. (in Chinese)
[44]DEHGHANI-SANIJ A R, DEHGHANI S R, NATERER G F, et al. Marine icing phenomena on vessels and offshore structures: prediction and analysis[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 143: 1-23.
[45]ASPLUND T. Ice channel in the context of maritime rules[D]. Sweden:  Lund University, 2011.
[46]蔡梅江,曹伟. 北极东北航道航行实践与安全性研究[J]. 交通信息与安全,2020,38(3):77-83.
CAI M J, CAO W. Navigation practice and safety research of Arctic northeast passage[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2020, 38(3): 77-83. (in Chinese)
[47]李振福,孙悦,韦博文. “冰上丝绸之路”:北极航线船舶航行安全的跟驰模型[J]. 大连海事大学学报,2018,44(3):22-27.
LI Z F, SUN Y, WEI B W. Car following model for navigation safety on “Polar Silk Road” [J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2018, 44(3): 22-27. (in Chinese)

Outlines

/