Causal pathways analysis of coastal water traffic accidents in China

Expand
  • (1. College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China;2. College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

Online published: 2023-09-13

Abstract

 To explore the causal path of various water traffic accidents in China Coast, a causal path analysis method for water traffic accidents based on Human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) model, Bayesian network (BN) model and path model was proposed. Firstly, based on the HFACS model, 5 levels including 38 causal factors for water traffic accidents were identified from the investigation report of water traffic accidents in China Coast. Secondly, the K2 algorithm was used for BN structure learning, and combined with chi-square test results and prior knowledge to determine the BN structure. Next, the maximum expectation algorithm was utilized for BN parameter learning. Then, the sensitivity analysis method was used to extract the causal path of various water traffic accidents. Finally, the path model was applied to calculate the causal path coefficients of various water traffic accidents and test their statistical significance. The results indicate that there are respectively 7, 6, 3, 7, 4, 4, and 2 significant causative pathways for accidents such as collision, sinking, contact, grounding, fire/explosion, wind strike, and stranding, in China Coast. From the perspective of effect level of causal path, the largest causal path of both contact accidents and stranding accidents is “improper allocation of chart data → improper navigation plan → contact/stranding accident”.

Cite this article

JIANG Yujie, WAN Zheng, CHEN Jihong . Causal pathways analysis of coastal water traffic accidents in China[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2024 , 50(1) : 76 -84 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.01.009

References

[1]KAPTAN M, UĞURLU Ö, WANG J. The effect of nonconformities encountered in the use of technology on the occurrence of collision, contact and grounding accidents[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2021, 215: 107886. 
[2]SALIHOGLU E, BESIKCI E B. The use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a maritime accident: A case study of Prestige[J]. Ocean engineering, 2021, 219: 108223.
[3]WANG H X, LIU Z J, WANG X J, et al. An analysis of factors affecting the severity of marine accidents[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 210(3):107513.
[4]孙家庆,李默涵,修晓仪.基于复杂网络理论的水上交通事故致因分析[J].大连海事大学学报,2023,49(2):80-90.
SUN J Q, LI M H, XIU X Y. Causal analysis of water traffic accidents based on complex network theory[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2023,49(2):80-90. (in Chinese) 
[5]李红喜,张连丰,郑中义.基于数据挖掘的船舶人为碰撞事故致因链研究[J].大连海事大学学报,2014,40(2):10-12. 
LI H X, ZHANG L F, ZHENG Z Y. Causation chain of ship collision accident due to human error based on data mining technology[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University,2014, 40(2):10-12. (in Chinese)
[6]HU S P, LI Z, XI Y T, et al. Path Analysis of Causal Factors Influencing Marine Traffic Accident via Structural Equation Numerical Modeling[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2019, 7: 96.
[7]司东森,张英俊,郎坤.基于改进BN的集装箱船舶碰撞事故致因分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(10):31-37. 
SI D S, ZHANG Y J, LANG K. Causation analysis of container ship collision accidents based on improved BN[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2019,29(10):31-37. (in Chinese)
[8]CHEN D J, PEI Y L, XIA Q. Research on human factors cause chain of ship accidents based on multidimensional association rules[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 218(20):107717. 
[9]LI Y L, CHENG Z Y, YIP T L, et al. Use of HFACS and Bayesian network for human and organizational factors analysis of ship collision accidents in the Yangtze River [J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2022, 49(8): 1169-1183. 
[10]黄常海,沈佳,朱冉超,等.基于C5.0决策树的船舶交通事故致因分析模型及应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2022,32(10):90-99. 
HUAN C H, SHEN J, ZHU R C, et al. Causation analysis model for ship traffic accidents based on C5.0 decision tree and application[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022,32(10):90-99. (in Chinese)
[11]付姗姗,张悦,席永涛,等.多因素耦合下长江口水域交通事故致因链分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2023,33(3):60-67. 
FU S S, ZHANG Y, XI Y T, et al. Causal Chain of maritime accidents in Yangtze River Estuary considering coupling effects of multiple risk factors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023,33(3):60-67. (in Chinese)
[12]席永涛,张靓,付姗姗,等.基于SFN-SD的北极冰区船舶航行风险传递路径研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2023,33(4):52-60.
XI Y T, ZHANG L, FU S S, et al. Research on risk transfer path of ship navigation in Arctic waters based on SFN and SD[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023,33(4):52-60. (in Chinese)
[13]LIU K Z, YU Q, YUAN Z T, et al. A systematic analysis for maritime accidents causation in Chinese coastal waters using machine learning approaches[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2021, 213: 105859. 
[14]SCHRODER-HINRICHS J U, BALDAUF M, GHIRXI K T. Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2011, 43(3):1187-1196. 
[15]UGURLU H, CICEK I. Analysis and assessment of ship collision accidents using Fault Tree and Multiple Correspondence Analysis[J]. Ocean engineering, 2022, 245: 110514. 
[16]吴琴,施欣,陶学宗.海事事故严重性影响因素及影响程度识别[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2019,19(1):185-191. 
WU Q, SHI X, TAO X Z. Identifying the factors and their impact levels on severity of maritime traffic accidents[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019,19(1):185-191. (in Chinese)
[17]LAN H, MA X X, QIAO W L, et al. On the causation of seafarers’ unsafe acts using grounded theory and association rule[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2022, 223: 108498. 
[18]KAPTAN M, SARIALIOGLU S, UGURLU O, et al. The evolution of the HFACS method used in analysis of marine accidents: A review[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2021(86): 103225. 
[19]LI F, WANG W, DUBLJEVIC S, et al. Analysis on accident-causing factors of urban buried gas pipeline network by combining DEMATEL, ISM and BN methods[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2019, 61: 49-57.
[20]CAKIR E, SEVGILI C, FISKIN R. An analysis of severity of oil spill caused by vessel accidents[J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2021, 90: 102662.
[21]LAURITZEN S L. The EM algorithm for graphical association models with missing data[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1995. 
[22]GeNIe Modeler. User Manual. (2023-05-19)[2023-06-25]. [EB/OL]. https://support.bayesfusion. com/docs/GeNIe.pdf. 
[23]余静,蒋惠园,胡佳颖.基于贝叶斯网络的浙江沿海船舶通航风险分析[J].中国航海,2018,41(2):97-101.
YU J, JIANG H Y, HU J Y. Navigation Risk Analysis for Zhejiang Coastal Waters with Bayesian Network[J]. NAVIGATION OF CHINA,2018,41(2):97-101. (in Chinese)
[24]WANG L, YANG Z. Bayesian network modelling and analysis of accident severity in waterborne transportation: A case study in China[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018, 180:277-289. 
[25]中国海事局. 广州“8·23”“SE PANTHEA ”风灾事故调查报告. (2020-02-27)[2023-05-25].[EB/OL]. https://www.msa. gov.cn/public/documents/document/mdkx/njmy/~edisp/20200227091632835.pdf.
China Maritime Safety Administration. Investigation report on wind disaster accident of the "8.23" and "SE PANTHEA" ship in Guangzhou. (2020-02-27)[2023-05-25]. [EB/OL]. https://www.msa.gov.cn/public/documents/ document/mdkx/njmy/~edisp/20200227091632835.pdf. (in Chinese)
[26]中国海事局. 湛江“10·4”“远大 668”轮风灾事故调查报告. (2020-02-15)[2023-05-20]. [EB/OL]. https://www.msa.gov. cn/public/documents/document/mduy/mzi5/~edisp/20200219052329948.pdf. 
China Maritime Safety Administration. Investigation report on the wind disaster accident of the "10.4" and "YUANDA 668" ship in Zhanjiang.  (2020-02-15)[2023-05-20].[EB/OL]. https://www.msa.gov.cn/public/documents/ document/mduy/mzi5/~edisp/20200219052329948.pdf. (in Chinese)
[27]王东升. 基于HFACS和BN的船舶碰撞事故人为因素研究[D].大连:大连海事大学,2020.
WANG D S. Research on human factors of ship collision accidents based on HFACS and BN[D]. Dalian:Dalian Maritime University, 2020. (in Chinese)
Outlines

/