Efficiency and fairness evaluation of carbon quota allocation methods in the port industry

Expand
  • (1.China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing 100088, China;2.Management College, Beijing Union University, Beijing  100101, China)

Online published: 2024-05-22

Abstract

The historical intensity method and benchmark value method are commonly used methods for initial allocation of carbon quotas.At present, only Shanghai and Shenzhen in China have included the port industry in the carbon trading system, and both use the historical intensity method for initial allocation of quotas.This paper proposes five carbon emission quota allocation criteria for the port industry based on the principles of efficiency and fairness, namely optimal industry emission reduction efficiency, optimal carbon emission efficiency, encouragement of advanced players, historical emission responsibility, and large enterprise responsibility, and constructs a comprehensive evaluation model for carbon quota allocation in the port industry based on TOPSIS entropy weight method.Empirical analysis is used to evaluate the efficiency and fairness of three quota allocation methods: historical intensity method, benchmark value method based on carbon intensity ranking, and mixed allocation method based on energy consumption limit.The results show that under the efficiency-fairness integrated objective and the two sub-objectives of efficiency and fairness, the relative proximity between the evaluation index and the optimal solution of the mixed allocation method based on the energy consumption limit is 0.566, 0.711 and 0.638, respectively, ranking first among the three allocation methods and obviously higher than the other two methods under the fair sub-target and comprehensive evaluation target.Although the mixed distribution method increases the complexity of the specific implementation process, it also improves the efficiency and fairness of the distribution results. 

Cite this article

ZHOU Yiying, LI Jing, GUO Weitong, SUN Dehong . Efficiency and fairness evaluation of carbon quota allocation methods in the port industry[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2024 , 50(2) : 149 -158 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.02.016

References

[1]上海市生态环境局.关于印发<上海市纳入碳排放配额管理单位名单(2021版)>及<上海市2021年碳排放配额分配方案>的通知[EB/OL].(2022-01-29) [2023-03-10].https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/gwk/search/content/6a80a9d46ec94195bc36d1bb53fc1702.
Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Ecological Environment.Notice on Printing and Distributing the "List of Units Included in Shanghai's Carbon Emission Quota Management (2021 Edition)" and the "Shanghai 2021 Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Plan"[EB/OL].(2022-01-29)[2023-03-10]. (in Chinese)
[2]深圳市生态环境局.关于公布深圳市2021年度碳排放配额分配方案的公告[EB/OL].(2022-06-29)[2023-03-10].http://www.sz.gov.cn/szzt2010/wgkzl/jcgk/jcygk/zdzcjc/content/post_9920395.html. 
Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Ecological Environment.Announcement on Announcing the 2021 Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Plan of Shenzhen City[EB/OL].(2022-06-29)[2023-03-10].(in Chinese)
[3]齐绍洲,王班班.碳交易初始配额分配:模式与方法的比较分析[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,66(05):19-28.
QI S Z, WANG B B. Initial Allowances Allocation in Carbon Trading: Comparison of Modes and Methods [J].Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences),2013,66(05):19-28.(in Chinese)
[4]王倩,高翠云,王硕.基于不同原则下的碳权分配与中国的选择[J].当代经济研究,2014(04):30-36+96.
WANG Q, GAO C Y, WANG S.Distribution of Carbon Credits Based on Different Principles and China's Choice[J].Contemoprary Economic Research, 2014(04):30-36+96.(in Chinese)
[5]王文举,孔晓旭.基于2030年碳达峰目标的中国省域碳配额分配研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(07):113-132.
WANG W J, KONG X X.Analysis on China's Provincial Carbon Quota Allocation Based on the 2030 Carbon Peak Goal[J].The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics,2022,39(07):113-132.(in Chinese)
[6]苏玲彦,姚艳霞,胡永飞,等.化工行业碳排放配额分配方法探讨[J].现代化工,2021,41(10):7-10.
SU L Y, YAO Y X, HU Y F, et al.Exploration on allocation method of carbon emission quota in chemical industry[J].Modern Chemical Industry, 2021,41(10):7-10.(in Chinese)
[7]夏晖,王思逸,蔡强.多目标条件下企业碳配额分配和政府公平——基于(p,α)比例公平的视角[J].中国管理学,2019,27(04):48-55.
XIA H, WANG S Y, CAI Q.Optimal Allocation of Corporate Carbon Quotas and Government's Fairness under Multi-objective Decisions From the Perspective of (p,α) Proportional Fairness[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(04):48-55.(in Chinese)
[8]Zhou P, Wang M . Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review[J]. Ecological Economics, 2016, 125(May):47-59. 
[9]孔颖超. 基于公平和效率原则的中国碳配额初始分配研究[D].天津大学,2019.
KONG Y C.Research on the Initial Allocation of China's Carbon Quota Based on the Principles of Equity and Efficiency [D]. Tianjin University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[10]陈卫东,胡盛林. 兼顾公平和效率原则的我国电力市场碳配额分配方案[J].煤炭经济研究,2020,v.40;No.463(01):15-21.
CHEN W D, HU S L. Carbon emission quotas allocation scheme in China's electric power industry based on the principle of equity and efficiency [J]. Coal Economic Research, 2020, v.40; No.463(01):15-21.(in Chinese)
[11]谭显春,程永龙,顾佰和.中国碳总量控制新进展:省域碳配额分配研究综述[J].气候变化研究进展,2023,19(01):63-73.
TAN X C, CHENG Y L, GU B H. New progress in controlling the total volume of carbon emissions in China: a review on the allocation of provincial 
carbon emission allowances [J]. Climate Change Research, 2023, 19 (1): 63-73(in Chinese)
[12]范瀚文,常征,付康.碳配额约束下港口企业绿色技术采纳补贴博弈[J].大连海事大学学报,2022,48(01):23-30.
FAN BW, CHANG Z, FU K.Green technology adoption subsidy game of port enterprises under carbon quota constraints[J]. Jounal of Dalian Maritime University ,2022,48(01):23-30.(in Chinese)
[13]Zhou Y Y, Jia Y M, Guo W T,et al.Allocation Method for Carbon Emission Initial Allowance in Port Industry[J].E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 248:02048.DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202124802048.
[14]交通运输部水运局.港口码头能效管理技术规程:JTS/T 196-13-2017[S].北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2017:1.
Water Transport Bureau of the Ministry of Transport. Technical Specification for Terminal Energy Efficiency Management:JTS/T 196-13-2017[S]. Beijing:China Communications Press Co.,Ltd.,2017:1. (in Chinese)
[15]国家发展改革委办公厅.关于印发第三批10个行业企业温室气体核算方法与报告指南(试行)的通知[EB/OL].(2015-07-06)[2023-03-10]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/201511/t20151111_963496.html.
General Office of the National Development and Reform Commission.Notice on Issuing the Third Batch of Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Accounting Methods and Reporting for Enterprises in 10 Industries (for Trial Implementation)[EB/OL]. (2015-07-06)[2023-03-10]. (in Chinese)
[16] 全国港口标准化技术委员会.港口能源消耗统计及分析方法:GB/T 21339-2020[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2020:1.
National Port Standardization Technical Committee. The Statistical and Analytical Methods for Energy Consumption in Harbor Industry:GB/T 21339-2020[S] Beijing:Standards Press of China,2020:1. (in Chinese)
[17] 柴乃杰,鲍学英,张天奇,等. TOPSIS-熵权决策法在绿色施工节水措施综合效益评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(05):156-161.
CHAI N J,BAO X Y,ZHANG T Q,et al.Application of TOPSIS-the method of entropy proportion in comprehensive evaluation about water-saving measures of green construction [J].Journal of Water Rsources & Water Engineering, 2017,28(05):156-161. (in Chinese)
Outlines

/