Optimization of joint shore power and berth allocation under time-of-use electricity pricing

Expand
  • (1.School of Economics and Management, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China; 2.College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Online published: 2025-03-14

Abstract

Considering the potential of time-of-use electricity pricing in reducing ship energy costs, the impact of shore power equipment connection and disconnection on berthing times, and the number of retrofitted ships equipped with onboard shore power receiving systems, this study aims to enhance terminal operational efficiency and reduce carbon emissions from auxiliary engine usage during ship berthing. Under the time-of-use electricity pricing mechanism, a joint shore power usage and berth allocation scheme is proposed. To this end, a bi-objective optimization model is developed to minimize both total operational costs and total carbon emission costs. An improved Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is designed to solve the model, incorporating heuristic methods, neighborhood crowding degree calculation, and a dynamic crowding degree update strategy. Case studies and sensitivity analyses based on the operational data of a container terminal show that the proposed improved NSGA-II algorithm outperforms the traditional NSGA-II algorithm in terms of both solution quality and computational performance in most test scenarios. When the proportion of retrofitted ships reaches 70%, the total carbon emission cost experiences the greatest reduction, while the total operating cost sees the smallest increase. Moreover, compared to the shortest off-peak period, the longest off-peak period in the time-of-use pricing scheme reduces total operational costs by 7.65%, total carbon emission costs by 2.47%, and increases the number of ships using shore power by 33%. These results indicate that lower electricity prices during off-peak periods significantly incentivize ships to use shore power. Time-of-use pricing helps reduce total operational costs. Among ship costs, waiting and deviation costs have a significant impact on total operational costs, while delay costs have a smaller effect.

Cite this article

WANG Xiaokun, DONG Zejin, WANG Yuwei, SUN Shichao . Optimization of joint shore power and berth allocation under time-of-use electricity pricing[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2025 , 51(2) : 77 -86 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2025.02.009

References

[1]CHEN S M, ZENG Q C, LI Y T. Integrated operations planning in highly electrified container terminals considering time-of-use tariffs[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2023, 171: 103034.
[2]YU J J, VOB S F, SONG X Q. Multi-objective optimization of daily use of shore side electricity integrated with quayside operation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 351: 131406.
[3]YU J J, TANG G L, VOB S F, et al. Berth allocation and quay crane assignment considering the adoption of different green technologies[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2023, 176: 103185.
[4]苟悦,梁承姬,张悦.分时电价下泊位岸桥联合调度研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2024,60(09):338-345.
GOU Y, LIANG C J, ZHANG Y. Research on joint scheduling of berths and quay cranes under time-of use price [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(9): 338-345. (in Chinese)
[5]郑捷航, 钟慧玲. 分时电价下考虑岸电船舶优先的泊位岸桥联合动态调度[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(29): 12763-10.
ZHENG J H, ZHONG H L. Joint dynamic scheduling of berths and quay cranes with berthing priority for shore power ships under time-ofuse price[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(29): 12763-12772. (in Chinese)
[6]YU P X, PENG Y, WANG W Y, et al. A two-stage day-ahead optimization method for berth allocation and energy system in seaport under time-of-use electricity prices[C]//2024 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific). IEEE, 2024: 806-811.
[7]PENG Y, LI X D, WANG W Y, et al. A method for determining the allocation strategy of on-shore power supply from a green container terminal perspective[J]. Ocean & coastal management, 2019, 167: 158-175.
[8]PENG Y, DONG M, Li X D, et al. Cooperative optimization of shore power allocation and berth allocation: A balance between cost and environmental benefit[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123816. 
[9]闵德权,张志铎,张伟航. 基于港口环境效益的岸电与泊位联合分配优化研究[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2023,42(01):83-90.
MIN D Q, ZHANG Z D, ZHANG W H. Optimization of joint allocation of shore power and berth based on environmental benefit of port[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2023, 42(1): 83-90. (in Chinese)
[10]WANG Z, HU H T, ZHEN L. Berth and quay cranes allocation problem with on-shore power supply assignment in container terminals[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 188: 109910.
[11]VAHABZAD N, MOHAMMADI-IVATLOO B, ANVARI-MOGHADDAM A. Optimal energy scheduling of a solar‐based hybrid ship considering cold‐ironing facilities[J]. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2021, 15(3): 532-547.
[12]ZHEN L, WANG W C, LIN S M. Analytical comparison on two incentive policies for shore power equipped ships in berthing activities[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, 161: 102686.
[13]ZHONG Z Y, JIN H, SUN Y Y, et al. Two incentive policies for green shore power system considering multiple objectives[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 194: 110338.
[14]TAN Z J, ZENG X Y, WANG T S, et al. Capacity investment of shore power berths for a container port: Environmental incentive and infrastructure subsidy policies[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2023, 239: 106582.
[15]WANG W Y, LIU K K, PENG Y, et al. Investigating relationships between shore power utilization and characteristics of ships and berths[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2024, 136: 104446.
[16]GONG Y, ZHOU Y F, LIU X C, et al. Identifying effective incentive policies for promoting widespread adoption of shore power technology[J].Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2024, 126: 103998.
[17]LU B, XU X, QIN X M, et al. Optimal shore power adoption decisions with government regulation considering port competition[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2024, 188: 103629. 
[18]ZHEN L, YUAN Y Y, ZHUGE D, et al. Subsidy strategy design for shore power utilization and promotion[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2023: 1-33.
[19]DAI H W, MA J H, YANG Y, et al. A bi-layer model for berth allocation problem based on proactive-reactive strategy[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 179: 109200.
[20] VAISHNAV P, FISCHBECK P S, MORGAN M G, et al. Shore power for vessels calling at US ports: benefits and costs[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2016, 50(3): 1102-1110.

Outlines

/