基于ANP和TOPSIS的零部件供应风险评价

张国权; 张云松; 赵中华

doi:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2013.02.013

大连海事大学学报 >

2013 , Vol. 39 >Issue 2: 82 - 85

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2013.02.013

基于ANP和TOPSIS的零部件供应风险评价

张国权 ,
张云松 ,
赵中华

展开

1.吉林大学军需科技学院, 长春 130062;2.大连理工大学管理与经济学部, 辽宁大连 116023

张国权（1980 - ），男，博士;张云松(1973-),男，博士生，E-mail: zhyunsong@163.com.

收稿日期: 2012-01-10

网络出版日期: 2023-05-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目（71101062 ）; 吉林省世行贷款农产品质量安全项目（2011-Z53）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助（201103153）.

收起

Components supply risk assessment based on ANP and TOPSIS

ZHANG Guo-quan ,
ZHANG Yun-song ,
ZHAO Zhong-hua

Expand

1 College of Quartermaster Technology, Jilin University, Jilin 130062, China;2 Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China

Received date: 2012-01-10

Online published: 2023-05-26

Fold

摘要

针对供应风险评价研究只关注供应商风险，缺少供应链全局视角评价问题，从系统科学的角度，分析构成供应风险的构成要素，建立供应链供应风险的评价指标体系，集成ANP和TOPSIS方法对供应风险进行评估，使得评价过程既考虑不同层次的元素组及元素间可能存在的关联关系，又依据评价企业与理想化目标的接近度排序.实例验证了评估模型的科学有效性.

关键词： 供应风险; 评价; ANP; TOPSIS

本文引用格式

张国权 , 张云松 , 赵中华 . 基于ANP和TOPSIS的零部件供应风险评价[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2013 , 39(2) : 82 -85 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2013.02.013

Abstract

Most of the current researches focus on suppliers risk and have no supply risk analysis from the perspective of the supply chain globally. The paper analyzes the elements of supply risk, and establishes supply risk evaluation index system of the supply chain, and then integrates ANP and TOPSIS methods to assess supply risk. The method considers feedback relationship between the internal and external groups of elements and then ranks the evaluation objects according to the closeness with idealized goal. Finally, the model is verified by empirical research.

Key words： supply risk; assessment; analytic network process (ANP); technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution（TOPSIS）

参考文献

［1］TUNCEL G, ALPAN G. Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study［J］. Computers in Industry, 2010, 61(3): 250-259.

［2］HILLMAN M. Strategies for managing supply chain risk［J］. Supply Chain Management Review, 2006,10(5): 11-13.

［3］ZSIDISIN G A. Managerial perceptions of supply risk［J］. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2006, 39(1): 14-26. ［4］WU T, BLACKHURST J, CHIDAMBARAM V. A model for inbound supply risk analysis［J］. Computers in Industry, 2006, 57(4): 350-365.

［5］NOORDEWIER T G, JOHN G, NEVIN J R. Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships［J］. Journal of Marketing, 1990,54(4): 80-93.

［6］NORRMAN A, JANSSON U. Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident［J］. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2004, 34(5): 434-456.

［7］LIU P, WANG T. Research on risk evaluation in supply chain based on grey relational method［J］. Journal of Computers, 2008, 3(10): 28-35.

［8］王莲芬. 网络分析法 (ANP) 的理论与算法［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2001,21(3): 44-50. WANG Lian-fen. The theory and algorithm of analytic network process［J］. Systems Engineering-theory & Practice,2001, 21(3): 44-50. (in Chinese)

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献