大连海事大学学报 >

2017 , Vol. 43 >Issue 3: 50 - 57

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2017.03.009

交通运输工程

基于熵权法的东北航道LNG船舶经济效益评价

  • 于涛 ,
  • 丁一 ,
  • 林国龙
展开
  • (上海海事大学 物流科学与工程研究院， 上海 201306)
于 涛（1992—），男，硕士生，E-mail:swifttao@gmail.com.

收稿日期: 2016-10-19

  修回日期: 2017-03-17

  网络出版日期: 2017-03-17

基金资助

集装箱港口多阶物流系统成本控制研究（71301101）；上海航运物流信息工程技术研究中心能力提升项目（14DZ2280200）；东莞市专业镇创新服务平台建设专项资金（2014B090908004）.

收起

Economic benefit evaluation of LNG ship through the Northeast Passage based on entropy weight method

  • YU Tao ,
  • DING Yi ,
  • LIN Guo-long
Expand
  • （Institute of Logistics Science & Engineering,Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306，China）

Received date: 2016-10-19

  Revised date: 2017-03-17

  Online published: 2017-03-17

Fold

摘要

为深入研究东北航道LNG船舶的经济效益，在分析东北航道通航现状以及北极资源的基础上，结合我国天然气供需状况，对通航北极东北航道和通航传统航道运输LNG的船舶经济效益进行比较.选择船舶营运指标、船舶经济指标、船舶投资指标构建船舶经济效益综合评价指标体系，采用熵权法对评价指标赋权，建立基于熵权法的LNG船舶经济效益评价模型.选取8个舱容为12.5万m3~16万m3的LNG船舶进行经济效益论证，并与主成分分析法结果进行对比.结果表明：舱容为14万m3的LNG船舶通航东北航道综合经济效益最佳; 熵权法能够对LNG船舶经济效益做出科学评价，为东北航道LNG船舶经济效益评价提供了一种可行的评价方法.

关键词： 东北航道; 熵权法; LNG船舶; 经济效益评价

本文引用格式

于涛 , 丁一 , 林国龙 . 基于熵权法的东北航道LNG船舶经济效益评价[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2017 , 43(3) : 50 -57 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2017.03.009

Abstract

In order to further study the economic benefits of LNG ship through the Northeast Passage, combining the supply and demand of natural gas in China, the economic benefits of LNG ship through the Arctic Northeast Passage and the traditional route were compared based on the analysis of the navigable status of the Northeast Passage and the Arctic resources. The ship operation index, ship economic index and ship investment index were selected to construct the comprehensive evaluation index system of ship economic benefit. The entropy weight method was used to evaluate the weights of the evaluation indexes, and a LNG ship economic benefit evaluation model based on entropy weight method was established. The economic benefits of 8 ships with 125 thousand m3~160 thousand m3 LNG capacity were demonstrated and compared with the results of principal component analysis. Results show that the comprehensive economic benefit of the LNG ship with navigable capacity of 140 thousand m3 is the best. Entropy weight method can make a scientific evaluation of the economic benefits of LNG ships, which provides a feasible evaluation method for the economic benefit evaluation of LNG ships through the Arctic Northeast Passage.

Key words： Northeast Passage; entropy method; LNG ship; economic benefit evaluation

参考文献

［1］LIU M J, KRONBAK J. The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe ［J］.Journal of Transport Geography, 2010, 18(3): 434-444.
 ［2］SOMANATHAN S, FLYNN P, SZYMANSKI J. The Northwest Passage: a simulation ［J］. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2009, 43(2): 127-135.
 ［3］VERNY J, GRIGENTIN C. Container shipping on the Northern Sea Route ［J］.International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 122(1): 107-117.
 ［4］HA Y S, SEO J S. The Northern Sea Routes and Korea’s trade with Europe: implications for Korea’s shipping industry ［J］. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2014, 1: 73-84.
 ［5］LASSERRE F. Case studies of shipping along Arctic routes. Analysis and profitability perspectives for the container sector ［J］.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 66: 144-161.
 ［6］LEE S W, SONG J M. Economic possibilities of shipping though Northern Sea Route ［J］.The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2014, 30(3): 415-430.
 ［7］LU D Q, PARK G K, CHOI K, et al. An economic analysis of container shipping through Canadian Northwest Passage ［J］. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2014, 1: 60-72.
 ［8］王志刚,王运龙,管官,等.长江中下游小型LNG船舶运输发展研究［J］.中国造船,2013,54(1):71-77.
 WANG Z G, WANG Y L, GUAN G, et al. Study of development of small LNG carrier transportation in middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River ［J］. Shipbuilding of China, 2013, 54(1): 71-77. (in Chinese)
 ［9］赵丹.考虑风险因素的小型LNG船方案决策研究［D］.大连:大连理工大学,2014.
 ZHAO D. The decision support system of small LNG ship’s plan considering risking factor ［D］. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese)
［10］王艳.船型方案评估指标体系初探［J］.中国航海,2011,34(1):101-104.
 WANG Y. A probe into ship form scheme evaluation index system ［J］. Navigation of China, 2011, 34(1): 101-104.(in Chinese)
 ［11］ZHANG W Y, LIN Y, JI Z S, et al. Multi-objectives fuzzy optimization model for ship form demonstration based on information entropy ［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2006, 5(1): 12-16.
 ［12］桑松,林焰,纪卓尚.采用改进的AHP方法进行船型方案MCDA论证［J］.大连理工大学学报,2002,42(2):204-207.
 SANG S, LIN Y, JI Z S. An improved AHP method for MCDM in ship type’s demonstration ［J］. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2002, 42(2): 204-207. (in Chinese)
 ［13］陈继红.基于灰色关联的船型决策经济论证方法与应用［J］.中国航海,2012,35(2):102-105.
 CHEN J H. Method of economic evaluation for ship form development decision making based on gray relational theory and its application ［J］. Navigation of China, 2012, 35(2): 102-105. (in Chinese)
 ［14］中华人民共和国海事局.北极航行指南(东北航道)［M］.北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2014:1-2.
 ［15］ Geology.com.Oil and natural gas resources of the Arctic ［EB/OL］. (2012-04-01) ［2015-12-10］.http://geolo-gy.com/articles/arctic-oil-and-gas/.
［16］周梅华.可持续消费测度中的熵权法及其实证研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践,2003(12):25-31.
 ZHOU M H. The research about method of sustainable consumption system measure ［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2003(12): 25-31. (in Chinese)
［17］章穗,张梅,迟国泰.基于熵权法的科学技术评价模型及其实证研究［J］.管理学报,2010,7(1):34-42.
 ZHANG S, ZHANG M, CHI G T. The science and technology evaluation model based on entropy weight and empirical research during the 10th five-year of China ［J］.Chinese Journal of Management, 2010, 7(1): 34-42. (in Chinese)
 ［18］杜栋,庞庆华,吴炎.现代综合评价方法与案例精选［M］. 第3版.北京:清华大学出版社,2015:143-145.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有 © 《大连海事大学学报》编辑部
电话：0411-84727810　
E-mail：xuebao@dlmu.edu.cn
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司