交通运输工程

启运港退税政策实施下港口选择模型

  • 王骜 ,
  • 辛旭 ,
  • 陈康 ,
  • 曾庆成
展开
  • (1.大连海事大学 a.交通运输工程学院; b.航运经济与管理学院, 辽宁 大连 116026;2.同济大学 经济与管理学院, 上海 200092)
王骜(1995 — ),男,硕士生,E-mail:wangao@dlmu.edu.cn.

收稿日期: 2019-01-02

  修回日期: 2019-03-18

  网络出版日期: 2019-03-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71402013);教育部人文基金资助项目(14YJC630010);中国博士后基金资助项目(2014M551064).

Port selection model in the implementation of  tax rebate policy at port of departure

  • WANG Ao ,
  • XIN Xu ,
  • CHEN Kang ,
  • ZENG Qing-cheng
Expand
  • (1a. College of Transportation Engineering;1b. School of Maritime Economics and Management,Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China;2. School of Economics and Management,Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Received date: 2019-01-02

  Revised date: 2019-03-18

  Online published: 2019-03-18

摘要

在保税港区对周边内陆干港与内贸港口实施启运港退税政策的背景下,基于用户均衡货流分配理论,构建实施启运港退税政策的港口(启运港)选择模型.模型可在既定总投资额的约束下,以区域社会经济效益最大为目标,确定启运港的数量与位置.设计嵌入Frank-Wolfe算法的遗传算法求解模型,并使用大连港腹地的出口数据进行实例分析.结果表明:依托大连保税港区实施启运港退税政策后,哈尔滨等七地被选为启运港,价值388.6亿美元的出口货物所在企业每年能够提前
10~25天获得退税款46.7亿美元.上述模型和算法可为政府制定、实施启运港退税政策提供必要的决策支持.

本文引用格式

王骜 , 辛旭 , 陈康 , 曾庆成 . 启运港退税政策实施下港口选择模型[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2019 , 45(2) : 19 -27 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2019.02.003

Abstract

On the background that the bonded port area implemens the tax rebate policy for departure ports to the neighbouring inland dry ports and domestic trade ports, a port (port of departure) selection model was constructed to implement the policy of tax rebate at the port of departure based on the theory of user equilibrium cargo flow distribution. The model can determine the number and location of the port of departure under the constraints of the fixed total investment and to maximize the regional socio-economic benefits. A genetic algorithm model embedded with the Frank-Wolfe algorithm was designed and solved, and the export data of Dalian port hinterland were used for case analysis. Results show that after the implementation of the tax refund policy for the port of departure relying on the Dalian Bonded Port Area, seven places such as Harbin were selected as the port of departure, and the enterprises with export goods valued at USD 38.86 billion can receive a tax refund of USD 4.67 billion 10 ~ 25 days in advance each year. The above models and algorithms can provide necessary decision support for the government to formulate and implement the tax rebate policy for the port of departure.

参考文献

[1]李志楚.我国启运港退税政策前景展望[J].集装箱化, 2013, 24(6):9-10
[2]王文清.如何操作出口货物启运港退税[J]. 进出口经理人, 2013, (3): 70-71.
[3]林国龙, 信晓雷, 丁一.基于启运港退税的航线网络优化[J].上海海事大学学报, 2015, 36(1):1-5
[4]杨芊, 林国龙, 信晓雷.启运港退税的航线网络鲁棒优化[J].水运管理, 2015, 37(10):8-11
[5]Chen C H, Mai C C, Yu H C.The effect of export tax rebates on export performance: Theory and evidence from China[J].China Economic Review, 2006, 17(2):226-235
[6]刘忠, 杜艳, 周茂.服装出口退税政策效应分析——基于产品异质性及国际竞争视角[J].经济与管理研究, 2016, 37(9):77-87
[7]兰宜生, 刘晴.对我国出口退税政策效果的实证分析及反思[J]. 财贸经济, 2011, (9): 80-84.
[8]辜娜, 吴磊.出口退税政策对出口贸易影响的实证分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2017, (9): 159-162.
[9]Yang H.Inland port location model under Trans Texas Corridor concept[J]. Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1443.; Supervisor: Yi-Chang Chiu., 2006.
[10]梁承姬, 高瑞瑞.宁波港中距离无水港选址问题研究[J].计算机工程与应用, 2017, 53(13):259-265
[11]吕靖, 常征.绿色物流理念下的内陆港选址模型及求解[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2013, 13(2):21-26
[12]常征, 齐壮, 吕靖.带有多重能力等级选择的内陆港选址问题研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(3):184-191
[13]陈康, 杨忠振.基于三方博弈的短途班轮航线优化模型[J].交通运输工程学报, 2011, (6):74-81
[14]Sheffi Y.Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis With Mathematical Programming Methods[M]. Prentice-Hall, 1984.
文章导航

/