基于AHP和TOPSIS法的甲板和舰载机旋翼流场质量排序

陈天佑; 孙鹏; 丁小娟; 李想

doi:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2020.01.006

大连海事大学学报 >

2020 , Vol. 46 >Issue 1: 47 - 56

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2020.01.006

船舶与海洋工程

基于AHP和TOPSIS法的甲板和舰载机旋翼流场质量排序

陈天佑 ,
孙鹏 ,
丁小娟 ,
李想

展开

(大连海事大学 a.轮机工程学院; b.船舶与海洋工程学院，辽宁大连 116026)

陈天佑（1996 — ），男，硕士生，E-mail：953178415@qq.com.

收稿日期: 2019-06-25

修回日期: 2019-07-25

网络出版日期: 2019-07-25

基金资助

中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目（3132016205）.

收起

Flow field quality sequencing of ship deck and carrier-borne aircraft rotor based on AHP and TOPSIS

CHEN Tian-you ,
SUN Peng ,
DING Xiao-juan ,
LI Xiang

Expand

（a.Marine Engineering College; b. Ship and Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China）

Received date: 2019-06-25

Revised date: 2019-07-25

Online published: 2019-07-25

Fold

摘要

为能够较便捷地对舰船甲板气流场进行系统评价，采用层次分析法（AHP）确定评估指标权重值，运用基于优劣解距离法（TOPSIS）对舰船甲板流场进行排序，进而分析关键点λ置和指标权重值变化对停机坪流场质量评价结果的影响.研究结果表明：该方法可以直接给出不同风速和风向条件下甲板流场质量排序；对于舰船甲板区域，TOPSIS法的评估结果与研究关键点位置的选取有关；对于停机坪区域，改变停机坪中关键点λ置和评估指标权重值，不会对TOPSIS法的评估结果产生明显影响，但是运用优化后的各个指标权重计算出的流场优劣特点更加突出.

关键词： 全通式甲板舰船; 停机坪; 气流场; 层次分析法; 优劣解距离法

本文引用格式

陈天佑 , 孙鹏 , 丁小娟 , 李想 . 基于AHP和TOPSIS法的甲板和舰载机旋翼流场质量排序[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2020 , 46(1) : 47 -56 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2020.01.006

Abstract

In order to evaluate the airflow field of ship deck more conveniently and systematically, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the weight values of evaluation index, and the flow field of ship deck was ranked by using the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. Then, the influence of key-points position and index weight values on the evaluation results of apron flow field quality was analyzed. Results show that this method can directly rank the quality of deck flow field under different wind speed and direction. For the ship deck area, the TOPSIS evaluation results are related to the key-points location. For the apron area, changing the key-points location and the weight values of evaluation index will not have a significant impact on the evaluation results, but the flow field characteristic calculated by the optimized weight values are more obvious.

Key words： full-deck ship; apron; flow field; analytic hierarchy process; technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution(TOPSIS)

参考文献

[1] 屈俊飞.大型水面舰船总体性能综合评估[J].军事交通学院学报,2018,20(09):45-49.
[2] 穆志韬.舰载直升机/载舰系统的特点及发展趋势团.江苏航空，2000(2): 15-17.
[3] 金仲林.舰载直升机系留座分布及系留载荷的仿真研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学硕士学位论文，2006.
[4] D.M.Roper,I.Owen,et.al.Integrating CFD and piloted simulation to quantify ship-helicopter operating limits[J].The Aeronautical Journal,2006:419-428.
[5] 吕红．舰船周围气流场数值模拟方法及分布规律的研究[D]．哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学，2008．
[6] 王新月.气体动力学基础[M].西安：西北工业大学出版社，2006
[7] 贺少华,刘东岳.舰船气流场品质评估指标研究[J].舰船科学技术,2016,38（2）：149-154.
HE Shao-hua, liu dongyue. Study on the quality evaluation index of ship airflow field [J]. Ship science and technology,2016,38 (2) : 149-154. (in Chinese)
[8] 吕建伟，齐欢，施文杰.基于粗糙集理论的舰船研制方案总体评价明.数学的实际与认识，Vo135(11), 2005:127-131.
[9] 吕建伟，王新磊，曾宏军.海军舰船设计方案的评估方法研究[J].中国舰船研究,Voll(1), 2006:21-24.
[10] 黄胜,郭海鹏,侯远杭,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的舰船总体方案群决策方法[J].上海交通大学,2014.48(01):92-97
[11] 张修远,常欣,李想,等.基于改进ELECTRE法的舰船气流场方案评估方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2016,42(11):2507-2515.
[12] 郭海鹏,黄胜,王超.基于改进德尔菲法的舰船总体方案群决策方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2014,48(04):515-519.
[13] Leopold, R. Mathematical Optimization Methods Applied to Ship Design.MIT Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Report 65-8, 1965.
[14] Mandel, P, and R. Leopold. Optimization Methods Applied to Ship Design. SNAME Transactions, Vol. 74, 1966.
[15] Mandel, P., and C. Chryssostomidis. A Design Methodology for Ships and Other Complex Systems. Philosphical Transactions, Royal Society of London, A273, 1972.
[16] Goldberg D E. Genetic algorithm in search,optimization and marching learning[M].Canada:AWPC Inc. 1985.
[17] Olcer A I. A hybrid approach for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems in ship design and shipping[J].Computers and Operations Research, 2008(35): 2760-2775P.
[18] Abdullah K, David W C, Aliee E S. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006(91):992-1007P.
[19] 高华，李东芳，于国杰等．海上直升机甲板受环境条件影响安全评估的研究综述[J]．中国海洋平台，2012,27(01):4-7+56.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献