恶劣海况下的船舶电力推进系统控制策略仿真

廖林豪; 高海波; 林治国; 熊留青; 陈亚杰; 王琦

doi:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2020.01.007

大连海事大学学报 >

2020 , Vol. 46 >Issue 1: 57 - 65

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2020.01.007

船舶与海洋工程

恶劣海况下的船舶电力推进系统控制策略仿真

廖林豪 ,
高海波 ,
林治国 ,
熊留青 ,
陈亚杰 ,
王琦

展开

（1.武汉理工大学能源与动力工程学院，武汉 430063;2.中国船舶重工集团公司第七一一研究所，上海 201101）

廖林豪（1995 — ），男，硕士生，E-mail：linhaoliaowhut@163.com.

收稿日期: 2019-09-05

修回日期: 2019-11-03

网络出版日期: 2019-11-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目(U1709215)；国家自然科学基金资助项目(51579200)；中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助项目(2018Ⅲ053GX).

收起

Simulation of control strategy for marine electric propulsion system under rough sea conditions

LIAO Lin-hao ,
GAO Hai-bo ,
LIN Zhi-guo ,
XIONG Liu-qing ,
CHEN Ya-jie ,
WANG Qi

Expand

(1.School of Energy and Power Engineering,Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China; 2. The 711th Research Institute,China Shipbuilding
Industry Corporation, Shanghai 201101, China)

Received date: 2019-09-05

Revised date: 2019-11-03

Online published: 2019-11-03

Fold

摘要

针对恶劣海况下电力推进系统常规控制策略适应性不足的问题，提出抗过旋控制策略.首先, 分析恶劣海况下螺旋桨出入水现象对螺旋桨产生的推力和转矩的影响，提出恶劣海况下带动态限速模块的抗过旋控制策略（抗过旋控制策略#1）和带吸气(ventilation)识别模块的抗过旋控制策略（抗过旋控制策略#2），并在后者中设计三种吸气效应识别器来侦测吸气效应；然后, 在Matlab/Simulink环境中搭建船舶电力推进控制系统仿真模型; 最后, 设计恶劣海况下的仿真实验，比较常规控制策略与抗过旋控制策略之间的性能优劣.仿真实验结果表明，在恶劣海况下，带吸气识别模块的抗过旋控制策略拥有优良的控制性能.

关键词： 电力推进系统; 恶劣海况; 螺旋桨吸气效应; 抗过旋控制策略

本文引用格式

廖林豪 , 高海波 , 林治国 , 熊留青 , 陈亚杰 , 王琦 . 恶劣海况下的船舶电力推进系统控制策略仿真[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2020 , 46(1) : 57 -65 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2020.01.007

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of inadequate adaptability of conventional control strategy of electric propulsion system under rough sea conditions, an anti-spin thruster control strategy for marine electric propulsion system was proposed. Firstly, the influence of water entry and exit on thrust and torque of propeller under rough sea condition was analyzed, the anti-spin thruster control strategy with dynamic speed limiting module (anti-spin thruster control strategy #1) and anti-spin thruster control strategy with ventilation identification module ( anti-spin thruster control strategy #2) were proposed, and three kinds of suction effect recognizers were designed in the latter to detect inspiratory effect. Secondly, the propulsion control simulation model was built in Matlab/Simulink environment. Finally, the simulation experiment under rough sea condition was designed to compare the performance between the conventional control strategy and the antispin thruster control strategy. The simulation results show that the anti-spin thruster control strategy with suction identification module has excellent control performance under the rough sea conditions.

Key words： electric propulsion system; rough sea condition; propeller ventilation effect; anti-spin thruster control stratery

参考文献

[1]Geertsma R D, Negenborn R R, Visser K, et al.Design and control of hybrid power and propulsion systems for smart ships : A review of developments[J]. Applied Energy, 2017: 30-54.[J].Applied Energy, 2017, :30-54 [2]Yoerger D R, Cooke J G, Slotine J E, et al.The influence of thruster dynamics on underwater vehicle behavior and their incorporation into control system design[J].IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1990, 15(3):167-178 [3]Whitcomb L L, Yoerger D R.Preliminary experiments in model-based thruster control for underwater vehicle positioning[J].IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1999, 24(4):495-506 [4]Fossen T I, Blanke M.Nonlinear output feedback control of underwater vehicle propellers using feedback form estimated axial flow velocity[J].IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2000, 25(2):241-255 [5]Blank M., Busk Nielsen. Marine Engine Governor[C]. In Proceedings of the second international conference on maritime communications and control. London, UK. pp. 11–20. [6]Sorensen A J, Adnanes A K, Fossen T I, et al.A New Method of Thruster Control in Positioning of Ships Based on Power Control[J].IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 1997, 30(22):199-206 [7]Smogeli O N, Sorensen A J, Fossen T I, et al.Design of a hybrid powertorque thruster controller with loss estimation[J].IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2004, 37(10):409-414 [8]Guo B, Bitnergregersen E M, Sun H, et al.Statistics analysis of ship response in extreme seas[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016: 154-164.[J].Ocean Engineering, 2016, :154-164 [9]Smogeli O N, Sorensen A J, Minsaas K J, et al.The concept of anti-spin thruster control[J].Control Engineering Practice, 2008, 16(4):465-481 [10]Koushan, K.Dynamics of Ventilated Propeller Blade Loading on Thrusters, World Maritime Technology Conference (WMTC’06), 2006[C]. London, U.K. [11]郭春雨，赵大刚，王超，等.波浪状态下的螺旋桨水动力性能实验研究英文[J].船舶力学, 2012, 16(09):1005-1015 [12]郭春雨, 张东汗, 王恋舟, 孙守超.近自由液面螺旋桨吸气数值模拟[J].华中科技大学学报自然科学版, 2019, 47(02):81-86 [13]Faltinsen O M, Minsaas K J, Liapis N, et al.Prediction of resistance and propulsion of a ship in a seaway[C]. Tokyo: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, 1980. [14]汪桐萱，任倩，梁景凯.恶劣海况下船舶电力推进系统抗过旋控制研究[J].舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(17):78-82 [15]窦孝钦．恶劣海况下电力推进系统控制策略仿真研究[D]武汉：武汉理工大学, 2015. [16]yvind N S, Aarseth L, Over? E S, et al.Anti-Spin Thruster Control in Extreme Seas[J].IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2003, 36(21):187-192 [17]?yvind N S.Control of Marine Propellers From Normal to Extreme Conditions[D]. Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2006. [18]许国根．模式识别与智能计算的MATLAB实现[M].北京：北京航空航天大学出版社，2012：125-129. [19]杨淑莹．模式识别与智能计算 MATLAB技术实现[M].北京：电子工业出版社，2015：87-136. [20]Oosterveld M W C, Ossanen P.Further computer analyzed data of the Wageningen B-screw series[J].International Shipbuilding Progress, 1975, 22(251):251-262

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献