交通运输工程

4PL港口供应链企业竞合与利益协调策略

  • 吕靖 ,
  • 乔雨 ,
  • 徐鹏
展开
  • (大连海事大学 a.交通运输工程学院; b.航运经济与管理学院,辽宁 大连 116026) 
乔雨(1994 — ),女,硕士生,E-mail: qiaoyudmu@outlook.com.

收稿日期: 2019-12-11

  修回日期: 2020-02-05

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-05

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71974023);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(3132019302);国家社会科学基金重点项目(19VHQ012).

Co-opetition and interest coordination strategy of companies in 4PL port supply chain

  • LV Jing ,
  • QIAO Yu ,
  • XU Peng
Expand
  • (a. College of Transportation Engineering; b. School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026,China)

Received date: 2019-12-11

  Revised date: 2020-02-05

  Online published: 2020-02-05

Supported by

 

摘要

以港口和航运企业两个物流服务提供商和一个第四方物流(4PL)集成商组成的港口供应链为研究对象,考虑集成商通过资源整合对港口供应链的绿色化及运作效率的优化作用,研究该供应链成员间的竞合与利益协调策略问题,分别建立集中和分散决策下的竞合与协调模型,通过数值实验对结果进行比较分析。研究发现,集中决策优于分散决策,港航联盟优于独立决策,且各方通过制定适当的成本分担契约可实现整个供应链的有效协调,可为港口物流服务供应链的管理提供有效参考。

本文引用格式

吕靖 , 乔雨 , 徐鹏 . 4PL港口供应链企业竞合与利益协调策略[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2020 , 46(2) : 49 -58 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2020.02.007

Abstract

Taking the port supply chain composed of two logistics service providers of port and shipping enterprises and a fourth party logistics (4PL) integrator as the research object, considering the optimization effect of integrator on port supply chain's green and operational efficiency through resource integration, the strategic of competition and benefit coordination among members of the supply chain was studied, the models of concurrence and coordination under centralized and decentralized decision were established respectively. It is found that centralized decision-making is better than decentralized decision-making, port and waterway alliance is better than independent decision-making, and all parties can effectively coordinate the whole supply chain by making appropriate cost sharing contract, which can provide effective reference for the management of port logistics service supply chain.

参考文献

[1]赵广华.基于第四方物流的港口供应链优化[J].中国流通经济, 2013, N/A(12):29-36
[2]Liu W, Wang Y.Quality control game model in logistics service supply chain based on different combinations of risk attitude[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, N/A(161):181-191
[3]Liu W, Yang L, Zhu D, et al.The influences of demand disruption on logistics service supply chain coordination: A comparison of three coordination modes[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, N/A(179):N/A-N/A
[4]Liu Xiao-tong, Zhang Kai, Chen Bo-kui, et al.Analysis of logistics service supply chain for the One Belt and One Road initiative of China[J].Transportation Research Part E, 2018, N/A(117):23-39
[5]Liu Wei-hua, DI Wang, Shen Xin-ran, et al.The impacts of distributional and peer-induced fairness concerns on the decision-making of order allocation in logistics service supply chain[J].Transportation Research Part E, 2018, N/A(116):102-122
[6]Liu W, Wang M, Zhu D, et al.Service capacity procurement of logistics service supply chain with demand updating and loss-averse preference[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2019, N/A(66):486-570
[7]段华薇,严余松,张亚东.考虑企业社会责任的物流服务供应链定价与协调[J].控制与决策, 2016, 31(12):2287-2292
[8]谭春桥,李波,崔春生.公平关切下考虑企业社会责任的物流服务供应链协调研究[J].控制与决策, 2018, N/A(N/A):N/A-N/A
[9]张建军,赵启兰.两级产品供应链与两级物流服务供应链利益协调研究[J].工业技术经济, 2019, N/A(01):58-66
[10]卢安文,杨东华.关于物流服务供应链契约协调研究[J].铁道运输与经济, 2018, N/A(06):42-47
[11]刘艳秋,蔡超.考虑双边可靠性的物流服务供应链协调契约研究[J].工业工程与管理, 2018, N/A(02):59-67
[12]经有国,徐洋,杨璐.基于收益共享的两FLSPs物流服务供应链协调契约[J].统计与决策, 2015, N/A(05):48-51
[13]Song Dong-ping, Lyons A, Dong Li, et al.Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective[J].Transportation Research Part E, 2016, N/A(87):75-96
[14]Talley W K, NG M W, Marsillac E.Port service chains and port performance evaluation[J].Transportation Research Part E, 2014, 69(3):236-247
[15]陆永明.港口供应链利益共享契约的协调机制[J].上海海事大学学报, 2017, N/A(01):52-56
文章导航

/