交通运输工程

考虑员工时间价值差异的偏远地区雇主班车联盟运营研究

展开
  • (宁波大学 海运学院,浙江 宁波 315211,大连海事大学 航运经济与管理学院,辽宁 大连 116026)
陈东旭(1991 — ),女,博士,讲师,研究方向:交通运输规划与管理;陈康(1983 — ),男,博士,教授,研究方向:交通运输规划与管理;杨忠振(1964 — ),男,博士,教授,研究方向:交通运输规划与管理。E-mail: yangzhongzhen@nbu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-01-05

  修回日期: 2023-03-01

  录用日期: 2023-03-01

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-01

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(72072097),浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LQ21E080004)

Employers' shuttle bus alliance operations in remote areas considering employee time value differences

Expand
  • (1.Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China; 2.Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Received date: 2023-01-05

  Revised date: 2023-03-01

  Accepted date: 2023-03-01

  Online published: 2023-03-01

摘要

为减少偏远地区员工的通勤成本,设计雇主班车联盟运营模式,构建班车联盟运营双层优化模型。其中,上层模型以所有雇主班车总的广义成本最小为目标,优化参与班车联盟的成员结构;下层模型考虑联盟内各雇主员工的时间价值差异,以联盟中的班车总广义成本最小为目标,优化联盟运营时各班车的行驶路径。基于Shapley值法公平分摊联盟运营班车的金钱成本。以宁波梅山地区三家雇主为例,优化后的班车运营方案显示,三家雇主联盟为最优的联盟结构,与各雇主单独运营通勤班车相比,联盟运营班车的总广义成本节省10.24%,其中,金钱成本节省26.44%,三家雇主分摊的金钱成本将分别减少27.7%、51%和5.9%;员工时间成本节省3.75%。

本文引用格式

陈东旭, 陈康, 杨忠振 . 考虑员工时间价值差异的偏远地区雇主班车联盟运营研究[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2023 , 49(2) : 113 -120 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.02.012

Abstract

To reduce the commuting costs of employees in remote areas, an employer bus alliance operation model was designed, and a two-layer optimization model was constructed for bus alliance operation. Among them, the upper level model targeted the total generalized cost of all employer buses minimum, and optimizing the member structure of participating bus alliances, the lower level model considered the time value differences among employers and employees within the alliance, with the goal of minimizing the total generalized cost of shuttle buses in the alliance, and optimizeed the travel paths of each shuttle bus during the operation of the alliance. The monetary costs of alliance operating shuttle buses was fairly shared based on Shapley value method. Taking three employers in the Meishan area of Ningbo as an example, the optimized shuttle bus operation plan shows that the three employers’ alliance is the optimal alliance structure. Compared with each employer operating commuting buses separately, the total generalized cost of operating shuttle buses by the alliance is saved by 10.24%, of which the monetary cost is saved by 26.44%, and the monetary cost shared by the three employers is reduced by 27.7%, 51% and 5.9% respectively; the employee time costs is saved by 3.75%。

参考文献

[1]YANG Z Z, YU S, LIAN F. Online shopping versus in-store shopping and its implications for urbanization in China: based on the shopping behaviors of students relocated to a remote campus[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23(2): 2846-2866.
[2]汤雅连,蔡延光,杨军,等.高校校车联营的协同车辆路径问题[J].计算机应用研究,2015,32(3):683-688. 
TANG Y L, CAI Y G, YANG J, et al. School bus routing problem for joint ventures strategy in universities[J]. Application Research of Computers,2015,32(3):683-688.(in Chinese)
[3]SHEN C L, SUN Y, BAI Z J, et al. Real-time customized bus routes design with optimal passenger and vehicle matching based on column generation algorithm[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2021.doi:10.1016/J.PHYSA.2021.125836.
[4]黄白. 多校混载目标下的校车路径优化方法研究[D]. 济南:山东建筑大学,2019. 
HUANG B. Research on vehicle routing optimization method under multi-school mix-loaded target[D]. Jinan: Shandong Jianzhu University,2019.(in Chinese)
[5]陈汐,王印海,刘剑锋,等.多区域通勤定制公交线路规划模型及求解算法[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2020,20(4):166-172. 
CHEN X, WANG Y H, LIU J F, et al. Multi-region commuting bus route design model and solution method[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020,20 (4): 166-172. (in Chinese)
[6]MIRANDA D M, de CAMARGO R S, CONCEI O S V, et al. A metaheuristic for the rural school bus routing problem with bell adjustment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 180: 1-14.
[7]ANSARI A, FARROKHVAR L, KAMALI B. Integrated student to school assignment and school bus routing problem for special needs students[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2021, 152: 1-18. 
[8]SILVA C M, SARUBBI J F M, SILVA D F, et al. A mixed load solution for the rural school bus routing problem[C]// 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Gran Canaria: IEEE, 2015: 1940-1945.
[9]CHEN H M, ZHANG Y H. Dynamic path optimization in sharing mode to relieve urban traffic congestion[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(7):1-16. 
[10]SHAPLEY L S. Stochastic games[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1953, 39(10): 1095-1100.
[11]YANG F Y, DAI Y, MA Z J. A cooperative rich vehicle routing problem in the last-mile logistics industry in rural areas[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 141:1-21. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102024.
[12]周雨阳,刘国鹏,陈艳艳,等.地铁公交线路合作博弈研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2021,21(3):40-46. 
ZHOU Y Y, LIU G P, CHEN Y Y, et al. A study on cooperative game of metro and bus lines[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021,21 (3): 40-46.(in Chinese)
[13]常征,范瀚文,张聆晔.基于修正Shapley值模型的航运联盟利益分配[J].上海海事大学学报,2022,43(1):38-44. 
CHANG Z, FAN H W, ZHANG L Y. Profit distribution of shipping alliance based on modified Shapley value model[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2022, 43 (1): 38-44. (in Chinese)
[14]GUO B, HAO S Y, CAO G M, et al. Profit distribution of liner alliance based on Shapley value[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 41(4): 5081-5085.
[15]SHA J, ZHENG S S. Revenue distribution of hybrid channel supply chain based on modified Shapley value with cost[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(2021-06-07)[2022-10-20].  https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4405185.
[16]LIU J, GUO Q. Research on benefit allocation strategy of green value chain based on improved Shapley value method[J]. World Scientific Research Journal, 2021, 7(9): 198-203.
[17]BESOZZI N, RUSCHETTI L, ROSSIGNOLI C, et al. The traveling salesman game for cost allocation: the case study of the bus service in castellanza[J]. Game Theory, 2014(2019-09-30)[2022-10-20]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/696945.
[18]饶卫振,张云东,段忠菲.中小学校车费用的成本分摊方法[J].系统工程,2020,38(1):141-153. 
RAO W Z, ZHANG Y D, DUAN Z F. Cost allocation method of school bus cost in primary and secondary schools[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020,38 (1): 141-153.(in Chinese)
[19]周魏. 网络购物的环境效益评估[D]. 北京: 北京邮电大学,2015. 
ZHOU W. Assessment on the environmental benefits of online shopping[D]. Beijing : Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2015.(in Chinese)
文章导航

/