基于自主船舶规范的控制权切换机制

章文俊, 牟聪瑞, 杨雪, 周翔宇, 孟祥坤, 李连博, 白伟伟

doi:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.04.001

大连海事大学学报 >

2023 , Vol. 49 >Issue 4: 1 - 12

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.04.001

基于自主船舶规范的控制权切换机制

展开

（大连海事大学航海学院，辽宁大连 116026;大连市自主航运安全技术重点实验室，辽宁大连 116026）

章文俊（1977 — ），男，博士，教授，博士生导师，E-mail：wenjunzhang@dlmu.edu.cn。杨雪*（1982 — ），女，博士，副教授，E-mail：xue.yang@dlmu.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2023-05-18

修回日期: 2023-07-19

录用日期: 2023-07-19

网络出版日期: 2023-07-27

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目（52201408）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（3132023144）；国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFC2801005）；中央引导地方科技发展专项资金项目（2023JH6/100100055）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（52271360）；四川省自然科学基金资助项目（2022NSFSC0891）。

收起

Control switching mechanism based on autonomous ship guidelines

Expand

(Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China;Dalian Key Laboratory of Safety & Security Technology for Autonomous Shipping, Dalian 116026, China)

Received date: 2023-05-18

Revised date: 2023-07-19

Accepted date: 2023-07-19

Online published: 2023-07-27

Fold

摘要

分析各国船级社制定的自主船舶规范，从切换场景、控制权获取优先级、控制权接管方、切换流程四个维度对L2级自主船舶控制权切换机制展开研究。结果表明：切换场景可根据特点分为三种类型，不同类型的场景与控制权接管方存在一定的对应关系；控制权获取优先级的顺序为“在船船员最高，岸基操作员次之，自主系统最低”；不同控制权接管方之间的切换流程存在一定差异，但需要遵循共同的基本原则。研究结论可为相关方建立自主船舶控制权切换机制提供参考。

关键词： 自主船舶; 人机共驾; 自主船舶规范; 控制权切换

本文引用格式

章文俊, 牟聪瑞, 杨雪, 周翔宇, 孟祥坤, 李连博, 白伟伟 . 基于自主船舶规范的控制权切换机制[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2023 , 49(4) : 1 -12 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2023.04.001

Abstract

In this paper the autonomous ship guidelines formulated by classification societies in various countries were analyzed, and the control switching mechanism of L2 class autonomous ships was conducted from four dimensions: switching scenarios, priority of control acquisition, control takeover agents and switching process. Results indicate that switching scenarios can be classified into three types based on their characteristics, and there is a certain correspondence between different types of scenarios and the control take over agents. The priority order for obtaining control is “highest on board crew, followed by shore based operators, and lowest in autonomous systems”. There are certain differences in the switching process between different control takeover agents, but common basic principles need to be followed. The research result can serve as a reference for relevant parties in establishing control authority switching mechanisms of autonomous ships.

Key words： autonomous ship; human-machine collaboration; autonomous ship guidelines; control switching mechanis

参考文献

[1] MARKETSANDMARKETS. Autonomous ships market by autonomy (fully autonomous, remote operations, partial automation), ship type (commercial, defense), end use (linefit, retrofit), solution (systems, software, structures), and region-global forecast to 2030[R]. Pune: Markets and Markets, 2019.

[2] 周翔宇,吴兆麟,王凤武,等. 自主船舶的定义及其自主水平的界定[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2019,19(6):149-162.

ZHOU X Y, WU Z L, WANG F W, et al. Definition of autonomous ship and its autonomy level[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(6): 149-162. (in Chinese)

[3] Maritime Safety Committee (MSC). Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its ninety-ninth session[R]. London: IMO, 2018.

[4] Ramos M A, Utne, I B, Mosleh A. Collision avoidance on maritime autonomous surface ships: Operators’ tasks and human failure events[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 116：33–44.

[5] 周翔宇,杨雪,费珊珊. 船舶自主化与自主水平划分标准评述[J]. 世界海运,2022,45(9):1-10.

ZHOU X Y, YANG X, FEI S S. Review of ship autonomy and autonomy level division standards[J]. World Shipping, 2022,45(9):1-10. (in Chinese)

[6] 严新平,李晨,刘佳仑,等. 新一代航运系统体系架构与关键技术研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2021,21(5):22-29.

YAN X P, LI C, LIU J L, et al. Architecture and key technologies for new generation of waterborne transportation system[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5):22-29.(in Chinese)

[7] Zbigniew P, Piotr W, Łukasz N, et al. The autonomous navigation system of a sea-going vessel[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 261:112104.

[8] Issa M, Ilinca A, Ibrahim H, et al. Maritime autonomous surface ships: problems and challenges facing the regulatory process[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(23):15630.

[9] 周颖,刘正江,王新建,等. 自主船舶避碰过程中人为失误的分析与评估[J]. 大连海事大学学报,2022,48(3):12-19.

ZHOU Y, LIU Z J, WANG X J, et al. Analysis and evaluation of human errors in collision avoidance process of maritime autonomous surface ships[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2022, 48(3):12-19. (in Chinese)

[10] Goerlandt F. Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships from a risk governance perspective: Interpretation and implications[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 128:104758.

[11] Zhang M Y, Zhang D, Yao H, et al. A probabilistic model of human error assessment for autonomous cargo ships focusing on human–autonomy collaboration[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 130:104838.

[12] Fan C, Montewka J, Zhang D. A risk comparison framework for autonomous ships navigation[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 226：108709.

[13] 潘登,孙武,赵继成. 全球主要船级社智能船舶规范比较[J]. 中国船检,2021,253(5):68-72.

PAN D, SUN W, ZHAO J C. Comparison of intelligent ship specifications of major classification societies in the world[J]. China Ship Survey, 2021, 253(5):68-72. (in Chinese)

[14] 中国船级社. 智能船舶规范 2023[R]. 北京:中国船级社,2023.

China Classification Society (CCS). Rules for intelligent ships 2023[R]. Beijing: CCS, 2023. (in Chinese)

[15] Lloyd’s Register (LR). Cyber-enabled ships ship right procedure — autonomous ships[R]. London: LR, 2016.

[16] RØDSETH Ø J, NORDAHL H. Definitions for Autonomous Merchant Ships[R]. Trondheim: Norwegian Forum for Autonomous Ships, 2017.

[17] Bureau Veritas(BV). Guidelines for autonomous shipping[R]. Paris: BV, 2019.

[18] ClassNK. Guidelines for Concept Design of Automated Operation/Autonomous Operation of Ships[R]. Tokyo: ClassNK, 2020.

[19] 中国船级社. 自主货物运输船舶指南（2018）[R]. 北京：中国船级社,2018.

China Classification Society(CCS). Guidelines for autonomous cargo ships 2018[R]. Beijing：CCS, 2018. (in Chinese)

[20] Korean Register(KR). Guidance for autonomous ships[R]. Busan: KR, 2022.

[21] Maritime Safety Committee(MSC). Interim guidelines for MASS trials[R]. London: IMO, 2019.

[22] Russian Maritime Register of Shipping(RS). Regulations for classification of maritime autonomous and remotely controlled surface ships[R]. St. Petersburg: RS, 2020.

[23] Maritime Safety Committee(MSC). Outcome of the regulatory scoping exercise for the use of maritime autonomous surface ships(mass)[R]. London: IMO, 2021.

[24] American Bureau of Shipping(ABS). Requirements for autonomous and remote control functions[R]. Texas: ABS, 2022.

[25] Det Norske Veritas. Autonomous and remotely operated ships[R]. Oslo: DNV, 2021.

[26] Det Norske Veritas (DNV). Competence of remote control centre operators[R]. Oslo: DNV, 2022.

[27] SAE International. Surface vehicle information report: taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems[R]. New York: SAE International, 2014．

[28] Xue Yang, Ingrid B U, Stian S S, et al. A systems-theoretic approach to hazard identification of marine systems with dynamic autonomy[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 217:107930.

[29] Ramos M A, Thieme C A, Utne I B, et al. A generic approach to analysing failures in human – System interaction in autonomy[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 129:104808.

[30] 中国船级社. 智能船舶发展展望2022[R]. 上海：中国船级社,2023.

China Classification Society(CCS). Intelligent ship development prospects[R]. Shanghai: CCS, 2022.(in Chinese)

[31] 中国船级社. 船舶自主航行附加标志检验指南[R]. 北京：中国船级社,2023.

China Classification Society(CCS). Guidelines for the inspection of additional marks for autonomous navigation of ships[R]. Beijing: CCS, 2023.(in Chinese)

[32] Liu C G, Chu X M, Wu W X, et al. Human–machine cooperation research for navigation of maritime autonomous surface ships: A review and consideration[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 246:110555.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献