三角拖运策略下的拖运企业联盟利润分配

展开
  •  (1.上海海事大学 物流科学与工程研究院,上海 201306;2.华南理工大学 工商管理学院,广东 广州 510641) 
丁一(1980 — ),男,博士,副教授,E-mail:yiding@shmtu.edu.cn。陈铠敏*(1992 — ),男,博士生, E-mail:202010106741@mail.scut.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2023-07-04

  修回日期: 2023-09-13

  录用日期: 2023-09-13

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-13

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972128)。

Profit Distribution of Drayage Business Alliance Considering a Triangular Drayage Strategy

Expand
  • (1. Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China;2. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

Received date: 2023-07-04

  Revised date: 2023-09-13

  Accepted date: 2023-09-13

  Online published: 2023-09-13

摘要

为帮助拖运企业实现高运转与低成本的均衡化运营,提出了一种基于“三角拖运”策略的拖运企业联盟模式。首先,构建了一个两阶段利润分配模型,用于完成联盟内集卡调度、集装箱路径规划以及联盟内部企业间的利润分配任务。然后,以一个集装箱港口的拖运企业联盟为例,利用CPLEX完成对模型验证与分析工作。算例结果表明:(1)基于“三角拖运”的联盟模式有效提高拖运效率和联盟利润;(2)基于利润与贡献的最小二乘值利润分配方法中,自身利润越大、贡献越高的企业分得的联盟利润越多,但随着利润重要度参数的增加,贡献较高的企业分得的联盟利润逐渐下降;(3)客户满意度、资源投入、风险承担能力等影响因素的权重与企业的分配利润呈正相关关系。最后,通过与平均分配法及Shapley值法等传统利润分配方法对比,证明了提出的两阶段利润分配模型有效提高了联盟企业合作的稳定性。

本文引用格式

丁一, 胡玉晶, 陈铠敏 . 三角拖运策略下的拖运企业联盟利润分配[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2024 , 50(1) : 113 -124 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.01.013

Abstract

To help drayage enterprise alliances achieve a trade-off operation with high efficiency and low costs, this study proposed a drayage enterprise alliance mode based on the “triangular drayage” strategy. First, a two-stage profit allocation model was constructed to facilitate the tasks within the alliance of truck scheduling, container route planning, and profit distribution among the member companies. Then, the designed model was verified and analyzed with CPLEX by taking a drayage company alliance in the container terminal as a study case. The results indicate that: (1) The drayage efficiency, and the alliance profit are improved through the proposed alliance mode based on ‘triangular drayage’; (2) In the least square profit distribution method based on profit and contribution, the companies with high-level profitability and contribution in alliance are allocated more reward, while their profit share decrease gradually as the increase of profit importance among enterprises alliance; (3) The weights of influencing factors (e.g., customer satisfaction, resource commitment, and risk-taking ability) are positively correlated with a company’s distributed profit. Finally, it is proved that the proposed two-stage profit distribution model can effectively improve the cooperation stability of alliance enterprises through comparing with the traditional profit allocation methods, e.g., the average distribution method and Shapley value method.

参考文献

[1]NOTTEBOOM T E, RODRIGUE J P. Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2005, 32(3): 297-313.
[2]吴晓研. 国际竞争视域下集装箱枢纽港横纵联盟策略与稳定性研究[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁工程技术大学, 2019.
WU X Y. Research on the strategy and stability of horizontal and vertical alliance of container hub ports from the perspective of international competition[D]. Shenyang: Liaoning Technical University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[3]赵旭, 王晓伟, 周巧琳. 海上丝绸之路战略背景下的港口合作机制研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2016(12): 5-14.
ZHAO X, WANG X W, ZHOU Q L. Research on port cooperation mechanism under the strategic background of maritime silk road[J]. China Soft Science, 2016(12): 5-14. (in Chinese)
[4]孟召薇, 王晓光. 基于区块链的航运联盟运力共享利益分配机制研究[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2021, 38(6): 1631-1636.
MENG Z W, WANG X G. Research on the benefit distribution mechanism of shipping alliance capacity sharing based on blockchain[J]. Computer Application Research, 2021, 38(6): 1631-1636. (in Chinese)
[5]KRAJEWSKA M A, KOPFER H, LAPORTE G, ROPKE S, ZACCOUR G. Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017, 59(11): 1483-1491.
[6]STERZIK S, KOPFER H, YUN W Y. Reducing hinterland transportation costs through container sharing[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2012, 27(2-3): 382-402.
[7]ÖZENER O Ö, ERGUN Ö. Allocating Costs in a Collaborative Transportation Procurement Network[J]. Transportation Science, 2008, 42(2): 146-165.
[8]CABALLINI C, SACONE S, SAEEDNIA M. Cooperation among truck carriers in seaport containerized transportation[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 93: 38-56.
[9]JIN X, KIM K H. Collaborative Inter-Terminal Transportation of Containers[J]. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 2018, 17(3): 407-416.
[10]EVANGELISTA P, MORVILLO A. Alliances in Liner Shipping: an Instrument to Gain Operational Efficiency or Supply Chain Integration?[J]. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2007, 2(1): 21-38.
[11]吕靖, 乔雨, 徐鹏. 4PL港口供应链企业竞合与利益协调策略[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2020, 46(2): 49-58.
LV J, QIAO Y, XU Peng. 4PL port supply chain enterprise competition and interest coordination strategy[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2020, 46(2): 49-58. (in Chinese)
[12]KOPFER H, STERZIK S. Reduction of Empty Container Repositioning Costs by container Sharing[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2012: 287-292. 
[13]KOPFER H, STERZIK S, YUN W Y. Reducing hinterland transportation costs through container sharing[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2012, 27 (2-3): 382-402.
[14]鞠惠竹, 曾庆成, 耿师导. 考虑横纵向一体化的港航联盟的收益模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 213-218.
JU H Z, ZENG Q C, GENG S D. Revenue model of port-shipping alliance considering horizontal and vertical integration [J]. Operations Research and Management, 2022, 31(3): 213-218. (in Chinese)
[15]王雁凤. 上海集装箱港口横向纵向合作博弈策略研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2012.
WANG Y F. Research on horizontal and vertical cooperation game strategy of Shanghai container port[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2012. (in Chinese)
[16]WANG X, KOPFER H. Rolling horizon planning for a dynamic collaborative routing problem with full-truckload pickup and delivery requests[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2015, 27(4): 509-533.
[17]JULA H, CHASSIAKOS A, IOANNOU P. Port dynamic empty container reuse[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2007, 42(1): 43-60.
[18]SHIRI S, HUYNH N. Optimization of drayage operations with time-window constraints[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016,176:7-20.
[19]REINHARDT L B, PISINGER D, SPOORENDONK S, et al. Optimization of the drayage problem using exact methods[J]. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research,2016,54(1):33-51.
[20]LOZANO S. Information sharing in DEA: A cooperative game theory approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2012,222(3):558-565.
[21]RUIZ L M, VALENCIANO F, ZARZUELO J M. The least square prenucleolus and the least square nucleolus. Two values for TU games based on the excess vector[J[. International Journal of Game Theory,1996,25:113-34.
[22]SHAPLEY L S. Cores of convex games[J]. International Journal of Game Theory,1971,1:11-26.
[23]SCHMEIDLER D. The nucleolus of a characteristic function game[J]. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics,1969,17(6): 1163-1170.
[24]LIU J C, SHEU J B, LI D F, et al. Collaborative profit allocation schemes for logistics companies coalitions with incomplete information[J]. Omega,2021,101,102237.
[25]SHAPLEY L S. A value for n-person games in Contributions to the theory of games II[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1953.
[26]BANZHAF J F. Weighted voting does not work: a mathematical analysis[J]. Rutgers Law Rev,1965,19:317-343.
[27]SANTOS M J, MARTINS S, AMORIM P. Almada-Lobo B. A green lateral collaborative problem under different transportation strategies and profit allocation methods[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,288:125678.
[28]戴福青, 王楠. 基于时空网络的飞机路线恢复优化模型[J]. 航空计算技术,2019,49(2):1-5.
DAI F Q, WANG N. Optimization model of aircraft route recovery based on spatio-temporal network[J]. Aviation Computing Technology,2019,49(2):1-5. (in Chinese)
[29]于少强, 宋夏薇, 陈康. 环渤海港口群发展的时空演化及影响因素分析[J]. 大连海事大学学报,2021,47(3):39-48. 
YU S Q, SONG X W, CHEN K. Temporal and spatial evolution and influencing factors of the development of ports around Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University,2021,47(3):39-48. (in Chinese)
[30]WAN S P, LI D F. Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees[J]. Omega,2013,41(6):925-940.
[31]LIU J C, ZHAO W J, LEV B, et al. Novel equal division values based on players’ excess vectors and their applications to logistics enterprise coalitions [J]. Information Sciences,2020,512:1543-1554.
文章导航

/