考虑区块链追溯的航运供应链服务定价研究

展开
  • (大连海事大学 交通运输管理学院,辽宁 大连116026)

赵旭*(1967 — ),女,博士,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:zhaoxu@dlmu.edu.cn;曲润泽(1999 — ),男,博士生,研究方向:交通运输规划与管理;黄瑞(1997 — ),女,博士,研究方向:交通运输规划与管理

收稿日期: 2023-08-13

  修回日期: 2023-10-19

  录用日期: 2023-10-19

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-19

基金资助

国家社科基金项目(18VHQ005)

Research on pricing of shipping supply chain services with consideration of blockchain traceability

Expand
  • (Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Received date: 2023-08-13

  Revised date: 2023-10-19

  Accepted date: 2023-10-19

  Online published: 2023-10-19

摘要

区块链技术的引入为解决航运物流透明度低、运输单证滞后等问题提供了有效方案,但不同航运链成员主导区块链系统的建设会对各方的运营决策产生不同的影响。对此,考虑货主对追溯信息的偏好,构建了港口、承运人和货运代理的三级航运供应链,由各方分别主导区块链溯源系统的建设,结合成本分摊策略,使用Stackelberg博弈模型,对比分析了基准模式与三种区块链技术模式下的最优定价策略。此外考虑了不同政府补贴模式下的补贴力度和成员定价策略。研究结果发现:区块链技术对于航运供应链成员来说并不总是最优决策,这与成本分摊比例、货主对追溯信息的偏好以及航运文书延迟成本有关。当货主对溯源信息偏好较高,而溯源成本较低时,各方应提高溯源水平,从而提高自身收益。政府的固定补贴模式无法给跟随者带来收益,而在追溯补贴模式下,当航运链领导者的分摊比例高于一定阈值时,追溯补贴力度的提高会使整个供应链的利润最大化。

本文引用格式

赵旭, 曲润泽, 黄瑞 . 考虑区块链追溯的航运供应链服务定价研究[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2024 , 50(1) : 102 -112 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.01.012

Abstract

The introduction of blockchain technology provides an effective solution to the problems in shipping logistics such as low transparency and low efficiency of transportation documents. However, the construction of blockchain system led by different members of shipping chain can have different effects on the operational decisions of all parties. In this regard, by taking into account shippers’ preference for traceability information, a three-level shipping supply chain composed of ports, carriers and freight forwarders is constructed, where each party leads the construction of the blockchain traceability system. On the basis of cost sharing strategy, the Stackelberg game model is used to compare and analyze the optimal pricing strategy under the benchmark model and the three blockchain technology models. In addition, the subsidy intensity and members’ pricing strategies under different government subsidy models are considered. The research results show that blockchain technology is not always the optimal decision-making for members of the shipping supply chain, but is related to the cost-sharing ratio, shippers’ preference for traceability information, and the delay cost of shipping documents. When shippers’ preference for traceability information is high but the cost of traceability is low, all parties should improve the traceability to increase respective revenue. Although the government’s fixed subsidy model cannot bring benefits to followers, while in the retrospective subsidy model, when the sharing ratio of the leaders of the shipping chain is higher than a certain threshold, the enhanced traceability subsidy intensity will bring maximum profits to the entire supply chain. 

参考文献

[1]KAMBLE S, GUNASEKARAN A, ARHA H. Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(7):2009-2033.
[2]LIU J G, ZHANG H M, ZHEN L. Blockchain technology in maritime supply chains: Applications,architecture and challenges[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021,61(11):3547-3563.
[3]BAO X X, XING X C, ZHANG D. Research on freight pricing mechanism of shipping companies considering supply chain management[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2019, 94:568-572. 
[4]ZHOU Y J, KIM K H. Optimal concession contract between a port authority and container-terminal operators by revenue-sharing schemes with quantity discount[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2019, 48(7):1010-1031. 
[5]LIU J G, WANG J J. Carrier alliance incentive analysis and coordination in a maritime transport chain based on service competition[J].Transportation Research Part E: Logistics andTransportation Review, 2019, 128:333-355.
[6]ZHAO N G, WANG Z P, JI X, et al. Analysis of a maritime transport chain with information asymmetry and disruption risk[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2023, 231:106405.
[7]XU L, GOVINDAN K, BU X, et al. Pricing and balancing of the sea–cargo service chain with empty equipment repositioning[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2015, 54: 286-294.
[8]LEE H, BOILE M, THEOFANIS S, et al. Game theoretical models of the cooperative carrier behavior[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(5):1528-1538. 
[9]ZHAO H D, LIU J G, HU X Y. Servitization with blockchain in the maritime supply chain[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022, 225:106195. 
[10]ZHONG H L, ZHANG F, GU Y M. A Stackelberg game based two-stage framework to make decisions of freightrate for container shipping lines in the emerging blockchain-basedmarket[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2021, 149:102303. 
[11]赵慧达, 刘家国, 王军进, 等. 考虑区块链技术投资的港航供应链决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(06):117-128. 
Zhao H D, Liu J G , Wang J J,et al. Research on Port and Shipping Supply Chain Decision Considering Blockchain Technology Investment [J]Journal of Management Engineering. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2022, 36(06):117-128. (in chinese)
[12]CARLAN V, SYS C, VANELSLANDER T. Cost-effectiveness and gain-sharing scenarios for purchasinga blockchain-based application in the maritimesupply chain[J]. European Transport Research Review, 2022, 14(1):1-19. 
[13]MOUGAYAR W. The business blockchain: promise, practice,and application of the next Internet technology[M]. New York:John Wiley , 2016.
[14]RADZIWILL N. Blockchain revolution: how the technologybehind bitcoin is changing money,business,and the world[J]. Quality Management Journal, 2018, 25(1):64-65
[15]Casino F, Kanakaris V, Dasaklis T, et al. Blockchain-Based Food Supply Chain Traceability: A Case Study in the Dairy Sector[J]. International Journal of Production Research , 2021, 59(19): 5758-5770.
[16]陈明, 孙浩, 邹一波, 等. 基于区块链的河豚供应链可信溯源优化研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(09):295-304. 
Chen M, Sun H, Zou Y B, et al. Research on the trusted traceability optimization of puffer fish supply chain based on blockchain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Mach nery, 2022, 53(09): 295-304.(in chinese)
[17]尤璞, 宋丽龄, 姚啸颖,等..基于区块链的生鲜农产品冷链物流可追溯体系设计研究[J]. 物流科技, 2023, 46(13):122-124. 
You P, Song L L, Yao X Y, et al. Design and Research on a Blockchain Based Cold Chain Logistics Traceability System for Fresh Agricultural Products [J] Logistics Technology, 2023, 46 (13): 122-124.(in chinese)
[18]YANG X, LI M, YU H, et al. A trusted blockchain-based traceability system for fruit and vegetable agricultural products[J]. IEEE Access, 2021,9:36282-36293.
[19]Tan A, Gligor D, Ngah A. Applying Blockchain for Halal food traceability[J]. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2020, 25(6):947–964. 
[20]XU J, DUAN Y R. Pricing and greenness investment forgreen products with government subsidies:When to apply blockchain technology?[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2022, 51:101108. 
[21]LIU P, ZHANG Z R, DONG F Y. Subsidy and pricingstrategies of an agri-food supply chain considering the application of Big Data and blockchain[J]. RAIRO-Operations Research, 2020, 56(3):1995-2014. 
[22]LIAO C H, LU Q H, SHUI Y. Governmental anti-pandemic and subsidy strategies for blockchain-enabled food supply chains in the post-pandemic era[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(15):9497.
[23]CHOI T. M.. Blockchain-technology-supportedplatforms for diamond authentication and certification in luxury supply chains[J].Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,  2019, 128:17-29.
[24]FAN Z P, WU X Y, CAO B B. Considering the traceability awareness of consumers: should the supply chain adopt the blockchain technology?[J]. Annals of OperationsResearch, 2022, 309(2):837-860. 


文章导航

/