易流态固体散货海运液化风险预测研究

展开
  • ( 1.大连海事大学 轮机工程学院,辽宁 大连 116026;2.大连海事大学 航海学院,辽宁 大连 116026;3.中华人民共和国辽宁海事局 大连危险货物运输研究中心,辽宁 大连 116001)
吴宛青*( 1963 — ),男,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:wuwanqingdmu@sina.com。白兆傲 ( 1999 — ),男,研究方向:易流态货物运输安全。赵子豪 ( 1993 — ),男,博士生,研究方向:易流态货物运输安全。 郑庆功 ( 1979 — ),男,副教授,硕士生导师。封星 ( 1985 — ),男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师。 杜嘉立 ( 1962 — ),男,教授,硕士生导师。张春龙 ( 1973 — ),男,高级工程师。吉海龙 ( 1987 — ),男,工程师。

收稿日期: 2023-07-16

  修回日期: 2023-11-04

  录用日期: 2023-11-04

  网络出版日期: 2023-11-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(51879025;52271358)。

Study on risk prediction of liquefiable solid bulk cargoes during sea transport

Expand
  • (1. Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China; 2. Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China; 3. Dalian Dangerous Cargo Transportation Research Center, Liaoning Maritime Safety Administration of the People’s Republic of China, Dalian 116001, China)

Received date: 2023-07-16

  Revised date: 2023-11-04

  Accepted date: 2023-11-04

  Online published: 2023-11-04

摘要

为有效控制海运环境下易流态固体散货因液化而导致的船舶倾覆事故风险,基于船舶运动学及波能理论,采用AWQA水动力计算软件,模拟分析了全球固体散货海运主力船型在各典型海域航行过程中所遭遇的外界环境载荷,并根据土动力学理论及三轴试验结果对相关外界环境载荷进行了货物液化风险的等效分析,在此基础上构建了货物液化风险评估模型。基于风险评估模型及其数值计算样本,采用BP神经网络算法完成了货物液化风险快速预测模型,实现了货物海运液化风险的快速智能预测,并通过模型的权值矩阵及阈值矩阵得到BP快速预测模型的显性表述。运用该预测模型,对4种典型易流态固体散货海运环境下的液化风险进行了快速预测,预测结果和评估模型给出的结果具有很好一致性。该预测模型可基于船型和海况等参数快速、有效预测易流态固体散货海运液化风险,为一线海事监管提供了有效安全监管方法,同时对IMSBC规则的发展也提供了良好的促进作用。

本文引用格式

吴宛青, 白兆傲, 赵子豪, 郑庆功, 封星, 杜嘉立, 张春龙, 吉海龙 . 易流态固体散货海运液化风险预测研究[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2024 , 50(1) : 66 -75 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.01.008

Abstract

In order to effectively manage the ship capsizing risk caused by liquefaction of liquefiable solid bulk cargo during sea transport, based on ship kinematics and wave energy theory, AWQA hydrodynamic analysis software was used to simulate and analyze the external environmental loads encountered by ships while sailing in various typical sea areas. According to the theory of soil dynamics and results of triaxial tests, the equivalent analysis of the liquefaction risk of the cargo and the related assessment model were carried out. On account of the assessment model and numerical calculation samples, BP propagation neural network algorithm was applied to construct the predict model, which realized the quick intelligent assessment of the liquefaction risk of cargo shipping. The dominant expression of the BP quick predict model was obtained through the weight matrix and threshold matrix of the model, and the predict model was used to quick assess the liquefaction risk of four typical liquefiable solid bulk cargos under shipping environment. The predict results were in good agreement with the assessment results. This risk predict model can quickly and effectively assess the liquefaction risks of solid bulk cargo according to the parameters such as ship type and sea conditions, which provides an effective method for the front-line maritime supervision, and a good promotion for the development of IMSBC Code.

参考文献

[1]徐浩其.易流态化货物海运安全中几个主要问题的商讨[J].航海技术,2022,255(3):24-26.
XU H Q. Major problems in transporting cargos which may liquify by sea[J]. Marine Technology, 2022, 255(3):24-26. (in Chinese)
[2]王春营.散货船装载易流态化货物运输[J].天津航海,2021,159(2):37-39+42.
WANG C Y. The bulk carrier to carry and transport the cargos which may liquefy[J]. Tianjin Navigation, 2021, 159(2):37-39+42. (in Chinese)
[3]国际干散货船东协会.《2012-2021散货船伤亡报告》[EB/OL].(2022-10-20)[2023-07-18].https://www.intercargo.org/wp-content/casualty-report/2022/.
INTERCARGO. <2012-2021 Casualty report on Bulk Carrier>[EB/OL]. (2022-10-20)[2023-07-18]. https://www.intercargo.org/wp-content/casualty-report/2022/.(in Chinese)
[4]QUINTERO J, GOMES R C, RIOS S, et al. Liquefaction assessment based on numerical simulations and simplified methods: A deep soil deposit case study in the Greater Lisbon[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2023, 169:107866.
[5]SUKKARAK R, TANAPALUNGKORN W, LIKITLERSUANG S, et al. Liquefaction analysis of sandy soil during strong earthquake in Northern Thailand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2021, 61(5):1302-1318.
[6]WEI J T. Particle-void fabric and effective stress reduction in cyclic liquefaction of granular soils[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 153:107081.
[7]刘必劲,张卫平.统一模型下粘性土和砂性土液化特性数值研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(1):75-81.
LIU B J, ZHANG W P. Numerical liquefaction study of clayey and sandy soils in a unified constitutive model[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2019, 39(1):75-81. (in Chinese)
[8]MOREIRA D D C, dos SANTOS C A S, MESQUITA A L A, et al. Influence of particle size distribution of iron ore fines on liquefaction during marine transportation[J]. Powder technology, 2020, 373:301-309.
[9]吴建军,金永兴,胡甚平等.铝土矿海上运输安全风险研究综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(8):87-95.
WU J J, JIN Y X, HU S P,  et al. Overview of safety risk research on marine transportation of bauxite[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(8):87-95. (in Chinese)
[10]FERREIRA R F, LIMA R M F. Relationship between particle size distribution and the PFD80 transportable moisture limit of iron ore fines[J]. Powder Technology, 2023, 414:118072.
[11]ZEYBEK A, MADABHUSHI G S P. Assessment of soil parameters during post-liquefaction reconsolidation of loose sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2023, 164:107611.
[12]ZHAO Z H, WU W Q, ZHENG Q G, et al. Three elements of liquefaction risk of liquefiable solid bulk cargoes during sea transport: Critical review[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2022: 1-19.
[13]WU W Q, LI Y, ZHAO Z H, et al. Quantitative analysis of liquefaction risk of liquefiable solid bulk cargoes during sea transport[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 258: 111751.
[14]交通部第一航务勘察设计院《海港总体设计规范》(JTS 165-2013)[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2014.
The First Navigation Survey and Design Institute of the Ministry of Transport<General Design Specification for Seaports> (JTS 165-2013) [S]. Beijing: People's Communications Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
[15]焦甲龙,张皓,陈远明等.长峰与短峰不规则波对船舶运动与波浪载荷的影响分析[J].中国舰船研究,2023,18(1):107-115.
JIAO J L, ZHANG H, CHENG Y M, et al. Analysis of the effects of long-peaked and short-peaked irregular waves on ship motion and wave loads[J]. Chinese naval research, 2023, 18(1):107-115. (in Chinese)
[16]李飞,蒋彩霞,耿彦超等.非线性波浪载荷在船舶剖面优化中的影响[J].舰船科学技术,2022,44(05):22-26.
LI F, JIANG C X, GENG Y C, et al. Effect of nonlinear wave loads in ship profile optimization[J]. Naval Science and Technology, 2022, 44(05):22-26. (in Chinese)
[17]竺艳蓉. 海洋工程波浪力学[M]. 天津:天津大学出版社, 1991.
ZHU Y R. Wave mechanics in marine engineering [M]. Tianjin:Tianjin University Press, 1991. (in Chinese)
[18]孙佳宇,段富海.基于AKF的无人水翼航行器纵向姿态控制研究[J].兵器装备工程学报,2023,44(2):108-112.
SUN J Y, DUAN F H. Research on longitudinal attitude control of unmanned hydrofoil navigator based on AKF[J]. Journal of Arms and Equipment Engineering, 2023, 44(2):108-112. (in Chinese)
[19]孙倩,周宏,罗萍萍等.波浪载荷下集装箱船船体结构的受力分析[J].船舶标准化工程师,2016,49(4):15-20.
SUN Q, ZHOU H, LUO P P, et al. Force analysis of container ship hull structure under wave load[J]. Ship Standardization Engineer, 2016, 49(4):15-20. 
(in Chinese)
[20]LONGUET-HIGGINS M S. On the joint distribution of the periods and amplitudes of sea waves[J]. J.geophys.res, 1975, 80(18):2688-2694.
[21]吴秀杰,郭洪梅,赵炳来,等.浅水海浪周期与波高联合分布函数的确定[J].海洋学报:中文版,1981,3(4):517-522.
WU X J, GUO H M, ZHAO B L, et al. Determination of the joint distribution function of wave period and wave height in shallow water[J]. Journal of Oceanography:Chinese Edition, 1981, 3(4):517-522. 
(in Chinese)
[22]黄必桂,金嘉萌,胡琴,等.基于实测资料的南海海浪波高和周期联合分布研究[J].海洋工程装备与技术,2017,4(4):187-192.
HUANG B J, JIN J M, HU Q, et al. Study on the joint distribution of wave height and period in the South China Sea based on the actual measurement data[J]. Marine Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2017, 4(4):187-192. (in Chinese)
[23]DET NORSKE VERITAS. <DNV-RP-C205 Environmental conditions and environmental loads>[EB/OL]. (2021-10)[2023-08-26]. https://brandcentral.dnv.com/fr/gallery/10651/others/1ca64bb105ca4c80a5d287814db8f2e3_hi.pdf?_ga=2.11252919.2039716839.1693130400-312011147.1680878495&_gl=1*1kke2z0*_ga*MzEyMDExMTQ3LjE2ODA4Nzg0OTU.*_ga_S064SE6ZM3*MTY5MzEzMDQwMC4xLjEuMTY5MzEzMTAwMy4wLjAuMA.
[24]DEE D P, UPPALA S M, SIMMONS A J, et al. The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system[J]. Quarterly Journal of the royal meteorological society, 2011, 137(656): 553-597.
[25]丁杰,吴国伟,杜敏等.基于ERA-Interim再分析数据的南海波浪能资源评估[J].太阳能学报,2022,43(9):424-429.
DING J, WU G W, DU M, et al. Wave energy resource assessment in the South China Sea based on ERA-Interim reanalysis data[J]. Journal of Solar Energy, 2022, 43(9):424-429. (in Chinese)
[26]周洋. 风浪激励下的船舶运动特征及对舒适性的影响分析[D].武汉理工大学,2021.DOI:10.27381/d.cnki.gwlgu.2020.000345.
ZHOU Y. Analysis of ship motion characteristics and its influence on comfort under wind and wave excitation[D]. Wuhan University of Technology, 2021.DOI:10.27381/d.cnki.gwlgu.2020.000345 (in Chinese)
[27]SEED H B, IDRISS I M . A Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. ASCE Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division Journal, 1971, 97(9):1249-1273.
[28]谢定义. 土动力学[M]. 西安:西安交通大学出版社, 1988.
XIE D Y. Soil Dynamics[M].Xi’an:Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 1988. (in Chinese)
[29]刘春生,程硕,李鑫鹏.基于损伤力学的碟盘刀具振动截割煤岩径向载荷[J].黑龙江科技大学学报,2022,32(03):380-386.
LIU C S, CHENG S, LI X P. Damage mechanics-based radial load on coal rock cut by vibration of disc tool[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, 2022, 32(03):380-386. (in Chinese)
[30]Maurer B W, Sanger M D. Why “AI” models for predicting soil liquefaction have been ignored, plus some that shouldn’t be[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2023: 87552930231173711.
[31]邹春玲,熊静,刘超,等.基于遗传算法优化BP神经网络的飞机油耗预测方法[J].智能计算机与应用,2023,13(3):226-230.
ZOU C L, XIONG J, LIU C, et al. Aircraft fuel consumption prediction method based on genetic algorithm optimized BP neural network[J]. Intelligent Computers and Applications, 2023, 13(3):226-230. (in Chinese)
文章导航

/