四体无人艇片体布局优化

王宁, 宋佳麟, 杨奇麟

doi:10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.04.001

大连海事大学学报 >

2024 , Vol. 50 >Issue 4: 1 - 11

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.04.001

四体无人艇片体布局优化

展开

(大连海事大学 a.轮机工程学院;b.水路交通控制全国重点实验室；c.大连市智能船舶绿色动力控制与测试重点实验室，辽宁大连 116026)

王宁*（1983 — ），男，博士，教授，博士生导师，E-mail:n.wang@ieee.org

网络出版日期: 2024-12-24

基金资助

国家高层次人才支持计划项目（SQ2022QB00329）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（U23A20680；52271306）；国防基础科研计划一般项目基础前沿寻宝项目（JCKY2022410C013）；辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”领军人才项目（XLYC2202005）；大连市科技创新基金重大基础研究项目（2023JJ11CG009）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（3132023501）

收起

Multi-body layout optimization of an unmanned quadramaran

Expand

(a. Marine Engineering College；b. National Key Laboratory of Waterway Traffic Control;c. Dalian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Ship Green Power Control and Testing, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Online published: 2024-12-24

Fold

摘要

针对四体无人艇的航行阻力性能受其分布式片体的横、纵间距耦合影响问题，通过综合对比多种片体布局方案在不同航速工况下的阻力系数，对自主设计的四体无人艇的片体布局进行优化。首先，构建多种布局方案，基于计算流体力学数值模拟方法与Fluent求解器对其三种航速工况下的静水阻力系数进行对比分析；其次，设计综合阻力系数评价函数，选取阻力性能最优的片体布局方案；最后，通过对比优化前后的航行兴波高度与片体表面压力进一步验证布局优化对整船航行效果的改善作用。仿真结果表明，片体纵间距是影响整船航行阻力的主要因素，片体布局优化后的综合阻力系数较优化前减小约12.9%，并且能够有效减小无人艇的航行兴波高度与片体表面压力。

关键词： 四体无人艇; 片体布局优化; 计算流体力学（CFD）; Fluent求解器

本文引用格式

王宁, 宋佳麟, 杨奇麟 . 四体无人艇片体布局优化[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2024 , 50(4) : 1 -11 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2024.04.001

Abstract

To address the issue that navigational drag performance of an unmanned quadramaran is affected by both longitudinal and lateral separations of multi-bodies, the entire layout of an self-designed unmanned quadramaran is optimized by comprehensively comparing drag coefficients of various schemes under different navigation conditions. Firstly, a variety of layout schemes are constructed to compare and analyze calm-water resistance coefficients under three different speed conditions by using computational fluid dynamics numerical simulation methods and Fluent solver. Secondly, a comprehensive resistance coefficient evaluation function is designed to optimize the layout scheme considering resistance performance. Finally, the improvement effect of layout optimization on the overall navigation performance is further verified by comparing the wave height and surface pressure before and after optimization. Simulation results show that the longitudinal distance is the main factor affecting the overall navigation resistance of quadramaran, while the optimized layout of multi-bodies reduces the comprehensive resistance coefficient by 12.9% compared to that before optimization, thereby effectively reducing wave height and surface pressure of the unmanned quadramaran during navigation.

Key words： unmanned quadamaran; multi-body layout optimizaition; computational fluid dynamics(CFD); Fluent solver

参考文献

［1］NI S K, WANG N, QIN Z Y, et al. A distributed coordinated path planning algorithm for maritime autonomous surface ship［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 271: 113759.
［2］SHAO K J, WANG N, QIN H D. Sideslip angle observation-based LOS and adaptive finite-time path following control for sailboat［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 281: 114636.
［3］WANG N, SUN Z, YIN J C, et al. Fuzzy unknown observer-based robust adaptive path following control of underactuated surface vehicles subject to multiple unknowns［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 176(5): 57-64.
［4］HAN X F, QI X J, ZHANG J C, et al. The analysis method of performance comprehensive performance optimization design for multi-body unmanned boat［J］.Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, 2219(1): 012048.
［5］WANG N, HE H K, HOU Y L, et al. Model-free visual servo swarming of manned-unmanned surface vehicles with visibility maintenance and collision avoidance［J］. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024,25(1): 697-709.
［6］邹蓓蕾, 陈淑玲, 王洪富, 等. 规则波中迎浪航行的三体无人监测船阻力性能及片体布局影响研究［J］. 江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021,35(3):16-23.
ZOU B L, CHEN S L, WANG H F，et al. A study on the resistance performance and hull layout impact of a three body unmanned monitoring ship sailing in regular waves ［J］. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2021,35 (3):16-23. (in Chinese)
［7］潘登, 郑东嵘, 程玉芹, 等.基于耐波性数值仿真的三体测量船片体布局优化研究［J］. 中国水运, 2018(8):65-68.
PAN D, ZHENG D R, CHENG Y Q，et al. Optimization of the hull layout of a three body measurement ship based on seakeeping numerical simulation ［J］. China Shipping, 2018 (8): 65-68. (in Chinese)
［8］李云波, 陈康, 黄德波. 三体船黏性阻力计算与计算方法比较［J］. 水动力学研究与进展A辑, 2005,20 (4):452-457.
LI Y B, CHEN K, HUANG D B. Comparison of calculation methods for viscous resistance of trimarans ［J］. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2005,20 (4): 452-457. (in Chinese)
［9］YILDIZ B, SENER B, DUMAN S, et al. A numerical and experimental study on the outrigger positioning of a trimaran hull in terms of resistance［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2020,198:106938.
［10］张明霞, 韩兵兵, 卢鹏程. 小水线面三体船与细长型三体船剩余阻力对比分析［J］. 中国舰船研究, 2019,14(2):21-29.
ZHANG M X, HAN B B，LU P C. Comparative analysis of residual resistance between small waterline surface trimarans and slender trimarans ［J］. Chinese Ship Research, 2019,14(2): 21-29. (in Chinese)
［11］李江华, 黄德波. 三体船构形与兴波阻力关系研究［J］. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2022,23(2):26-32.
LI J H, HUANG D B. Research on the relationship between trimaran configuration and wave making resistance ［J］. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2022,23 (2): 26-32. (in Chinese)
［12］ASKARIAN K A, FEIZI A, MOHAMADI A, et al. An experimental study on the effect of the side hull symmetry on the resistance performance of a wave-piercing trimaran［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2021, 20(3): 456-466.
［13］HU J F, ZHANG Y H, WANG P, et al. Numerical and experimental study on resistance of asymmetric catamaran with different layouts ［J］. Brodogradnja, 2020, 71(2): 91-110.
［14］KURSETGJERDE A M S. Hydrodynamic optimization of trimaran workboat hulls［D］. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2017.
［15］张明霞, 韩兵兵, 卢鹏程, 等. 基于STAR-CCM+的小水线面三体船阻力数值仿真［J］. 中国舰船研究, 2018,13(4):79-85.
ZHANG M X, HAN B B, LU P C, et al. Numerical simulation of resistance of small waterline surface trimaran based on STAR-CCM+［J］. China Ship Research, 2018,13(4): 79-85. (in Chinese)
［16］WANG S M, DUAN W Y. Study on the multi-objective optimization method of trimaran outrigger layout［J］. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022,17(7):1646-1652.
［17］NAZEMIAN A, GHADIMI P. Global optimization of trimaran hull form to get minimum resistance by slender body method［J］. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2021, 43(2): 43-67.
［18］NAZEMIAN A, GHADIMI P. CFD-based optimization of a displacement trimaran hull for improving its calm water and wavy condition resistance［J］. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 113(1): 1-20.
［19］WANG X Z, LIU L W, ZHANG Z G, et al. Numerical study of the stern flap effect on catamaran’ seakeeping characteristic in regular head waves［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 206: 1-14.
［20］YANUAR, GUNAWAN, MUHYI A, et al. Ship resistance of quadramaran with various hull position configurations［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2016, 15: 28-32.
［21］王红军. 高速三体船片体布局优化实验研究［D］. 大连：大连理工大学, 2007.
WANG H J. Experimental research on optimization of high-speed trimaran body layout ［D］. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2007. (in Chinese)
［22］张明霞, 卢鹏程, 王志豪. 小水线面三体船耐波性数值模拟［J］. 中国舰船研究, 2020,15(4)：135-143.
ZHANG M X，LU P C，WANG Z H. Numerical simulation of the seakeeping performance of a small waterline surface trimaran［J］. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2020, 15(4): 135-143. (in Chinese)
［23］WANG N, SONG J L, DONG Q. Structural design of a wave-adaptive unmanned quadramaran with independent suspension［J］. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024,25(9): 12395-12406.
［24］American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Fluids Engineering Division. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics［M］.［S.l.］: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1993.
［25］MANNA P, DHARAVATH M, SINHA P K, et al. Optimization of a flight-worthy scramjet combustor through CFD［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 27(1): 138-146.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献