多孔碳化硅抑制氢-空气爆燃的效果及机理

展开
  • (大连海事大学 轮机工程学院,辽宁 大连 116026)
梁焯辉(2001 —),男,硕士生,研究方向:可燃气体爆炸的抑制效果及机理,E-mail:lzh0112@dlmu.edu.cn;张彬*(1982 —),男,博士,教授,研究方向:船舶危管防污与节能。E-mail:zb_2010@dlmu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2025-03-05

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2023YFB4301702)

Effect and mechanism of porous silicon carbide in suppressing hydrogen-air explosion

Expand
  • (College of Marine Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Online published: 2025-03-05

摘要

为研究多孔碳化硅在氢动力船舶中对氢气爆燃事故的抑制效果及机理,搭建了可燃气体半开敞抑爆实验平台,通过改变多孔碳化硅的放置位置、孔径及当量比等参数探究其抑制氢空气预混气体爆燃的效果,并结合数值模拟分析其抑爆机理。结果表明:多孔碳化硅对氢气空气爆燃的抑制作用机制包括吸热降温、火焰淬熄及超压衰减。然而,多孔碳化硅也会对未燃气体产生扰动,导致火焰形态变形,从而加剧爆燃反应。在相同孔径和当量比条件下,材料距离点火源较近时,抑制效果显著,因为火焰到达多孔碳化硅表面时,两侧的压差较小,从而降低了火焰在孔道中的流动速度,进而中断了能量传递并使火焰熄灭。在氢空气当量比为0.4、距离点火源110 mm工况时,40 PPI和50 PPI的多孔碳化硅均能有效抑制氢气火焰传播,火焰速度峰值分别降低5.2 m/s和12.5 m/s,超压峰值的衰减率分别为26.5%和7.2%;在距离点火源220 mm工况时,50 PPI孔径的碳化硅可有效淬熄大部分火焰,火焰速度和超压峰值分别降低10.5%和13.9%;在距离增至330 mm时,三种孔径的碳化硅均无法有效阻止火焰传播,相反,由于对火焰锋面的破坏作用,导致爆燃反应更加剧烈。不同当量比下,燃烧的能量释放和反应速率存在差异,这也会直接影响多孔碳化硅的抑爆效果,当量比降至0.3时,多孔碳化硅的抑爆效果增强;当量比提高至0.5时,能量释放增加,导致碳化硅的抑制效果减弱。


本文引用格式

梁焯辉, 张彬, 朱文斌, 夏远辰, 王博乔, 张斯琦 . 多孔碳化硅抑制氢-空气爆燃的效果及机理[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2025 , 51(2) : 125 -134 . DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2025.02.014

Abstract

To study the suppression effect and mechanism of porous silicon carbide on hydrogen explosion accidents in hydrogen-powered ships, a semi-open combustible gas suppression experimental platform was built. By changing the placement position, pore size, and equivalence ratio of porous silicon carbide, the effect of suppressing hydrogen-air premixed gas explosion was explored, and the explosion suppression mechanism was analyzed by numerical simulation. Results show that the suppression mechanism of porous silicon carbide on hydrogen-air deflagration includes heat absorption and cooling, flame quenching, and overpressure attenuation. However, porous silicon carbide can also disturb the unburned gas, causing deformation of the flame shape, thereby intensifying the deflagration. Under the same pore size and equivalence ratio conditions, the suppression effect is significant when the material is close to the ignition source, because when the flame reaches the surface of porous silicon carbide, the pressure difference on both sides is small, thereby reducing the flow velocity of the flame in the pore, interrupting energy transfer and extinguishing the flame. When the hydrogen-air equivalence ratio is 0.4 and the distance from the ignition source is 110 mm, porous silicon carbide with 40 PPI and 50 PPI can effectively suppress hydrogen flame propagation, and the peak flame velocity is reduced by 5.2 m/s and 12.5 m/s, respectively, and the attenuation rate of overpressure peak is 26.5% and 7.2%, respectively. At a distance of 220 mm from the ignition source, porous silicon carbide with 50 PPI can effectively extinguish most flames, reducing flame speed and peak overpressure by 10.5% and 13.9%, respectively. When the distance increases to 330 mm, the three types of porous silicon carbide pore sizes can not effectively prevent flame propagation. On the contrary, due to their destructive effect on the flame front, the detonation reaction became more intense. Under different equivalence ratios, differences in energy release and reaction rates directly affect the suppression effect of porous silicon carbide, when the equivalence ratio drops to 0.3, the explosion suppression effect of porous silicon carbide is enhanced, and when the equivalence ratio is increased to 0.5, the energy release increases, leading to weakening of the suppression effect of porous silicon carbide.


参考文献

[1] 黄有方, 魏明晖, 王煜, 等. “双碳”目标导向下我国绿色航运物流发展现状与趋势 [J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2023, 49(1): 1-16.
HUANG Y F, WEI M H, WANG Y, et al. Current situation and trend of green shipping logistics in China under the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2023, 49(1):1-16.(in Chinese)
[2] LI Y W, YUEN K F, ZHOU Y S. Risk assessment of achieving greenhouse gas emission reduction target in maritime industry [J]. Transport Policy, 2024,155:29-46.
[3] SÁNCHEZ A, RENGEL M A M, MARTÍN M. A zero CO2 emissions large ship fuelled by an ammonia-hydrogen blend: Reaching the decarbonisation goals [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 293: 117497.
[4] 胡玉真, 王敏, 李灵东,等. 我国氨氢动力海上船舶创新发展研究 [J]. 中国工程科学, 2023, 25(2): 133-146.
HU Y Z, WANG M, LI L D, et al. Innovative development of ammonia-hydrogen powered marine ships in China[J]. Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineerng,2023,25(2):133-146.(in Chinese)
[5] XIE Y C, LIU J, QIN J, et al. Numerical simulation of hydrogen leakage and diffusion in a ship engine room [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 55: 42-54.
[6] 徐晓健, 杨瑞, 纪永波,等. 氢燃料电池动力船舶关键技术综述 [J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2022, 22(4): 47-67.
XU X J,YANG R,JI Y B,et al.Review on key technologies of hydrogen fuel cell powered vessels[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2022,22(4):47-67.(in Chinese)
[7] 汪瑞齐, 张彬, 夏远辰,等. 泄压口面积对氢-空气爆燃特性的影响 [J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2024, 50(3): 157-166.
WANG R Q,ZHANG B,XIA Y C,et al.Influence of pressure relief port area on hydrogen air deflagration characteristics[J].Journal of Dalian Maritime University,2024,50(3):157-166.(in Chinese)
[8] 许家铭, 涂惺肄, 张易. “三峡氢舟1”号安全与应急处置能力评估 [J]. 船电技术, 2024, 44(8): 50-54.
XU J M,TU X Y,ZHANG Y."Three gorges hydrogen boat 1" safety and emergency response capability assessment[J].Marine Electric & Electronic Technology,2024,44(8):50-54.(in Chinese)
[9] QIU S J, ZHAO S X, PANG G L, et al. Disaster evaluation of hydrogen explosion leakage from industrial-scale non-metallic pipeline [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 70: 591-598.
[10] MAO X B, YING R S, YUAN Y P, et al. Simulation and analysis of hydrogen leakage and explosion behaviors in various compartments on a hydrogen fuel cell ship [J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2021, 46(9): 6857-6872.
[11] DUAN Y L, WANG S, YANG Y L, et al. Experimental study on methane explosion characteristics with different types of porous media [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2021, 69:104370.
[12] DUAN Y L, LONG F Y, HUANG J, et al. Effects of porous materials with different thickness and obstacle layout on methane/hydrogen mixture explosion with low hydrogen ratio [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(63): 27237-27249.
[13] LI Y, ZHAO Q, LIU L J, et al. Investigation on the flame and explosion suppression of hydrogen/air mixtures by porous copper foams in the pipe with large aspect ratio [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2022, 76:104744.
[14] ZHOU S Y, GAO J C, LUO Z M, et al. Effects of mesh aluminium alloy and aluminium velvet on the explosion of H2/air, CH4/air and C2H2/air mixtures [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(27): 14871-14880.
[15] YANG Z K, ZHAO K, SONG X Z, et al. Effects of mesh aluminium alloys and propane addition on the explosion-suppression characteristics of hydrogen-air mixture [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(70): 34998-35013.
[16] CHENG F M, CHANG Z C, LUO Z M, et al. Large eddy simulation and experimental study of the effect of wire mesh on flame behaviours of methane/air explosions in a semi-confined pipe [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 68:104258.
[17] CHEN P, HUANG F J, SUN Y D, et al. Effects of metal foam meshes on premixed methane-air flame propagation in the closed duct [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 47: 22-28.
[18] ZHENG L G, ZHU X C, WANG Y L, et al. Combined effect of ignition position and equivalence ratio on the characteristics of premixed hydrogen/air deflagrations [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(33): 16430-16441.
[19] WANG Q H, WAN H X, BI M S, et al. Effects of ignition position and hydrogen concentration on the flame propagation characteristics of hydrogen–air deflagration [J]. Fuel, 2024, 359: 130349.
[20] LEI B W, GUO Z K, XU Z B, et al. Numerical simulation study on the effect of ignition position on premixed hydrogen deflagration characteristics in tunnels [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 81: 1394-1407.
[21] QIN C, TIAN Y, YANG Z R, et al. Quantitative analysis of hydrogen leakage flow measurement and calculation in the on-board hydrogen system pipelines [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 89: 1025-1039.
[22] 张清清, 王江伟, 白日欣,等. 纯氢管道泄漏扩散规律研究 [J]. 化工设备与管道, 2024, 61(5): 79-84.
ZHANG Q Q, WANG J W, BAI R X, et al. Research on the leakage and diffusion law of pure hydrogen pipeline[J]. Process Equipment & Piping, 2024, 61(5): 79-84. (in Chinese)
[23] LI Y, ZHAO Q, CHEN X F, et al. Effect of copper foam on the explosion suppression in hydrogen/air with different equivalence ratios [J]. Fuel, 2023, 333:126324.
[24] LI Y C, BI M S, ZHOU Y H, et al. Hydrogen cloud explosion suppression by micron-size water mist [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(55): 23462-23470.

文章导航

/